Search Tips
trié par
30 Listé sur un total de 121 Entités
Protection of journalists and press freedom 2010, para. 21
- Paragraph text
- Journalists are understood to be individuals who are dedicated to investigating, analysing and disseminating information, in a regular and specialized manner, through any type of written media, broadcast media (television or radio) or electronic media. With the advent of new forms of communication, journalism has extended into new areas, including citizen journalism (see section V). The Special Rapporteur underscores that journalists should not be subject to conditions such as compulsory membership in professional associations or a university degree to practise journalism. When reference is made to journalists in the present report, the Special Rapporteur is also alluding by extension to other media professionals and associated personnel, given the fact that they are also often targeted because of their activities in gathering and disseminating information and for being part of "the press".
- Organe
- Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of the right to freedom of opinion and expression
- Type de document
- Special Procedures' report
- Thèmes
- Civil & Political Rights
- Equality & Inclusion
- Governance & Rule of Law
- Année
- 2010
- Date de modification
- 21 sept. 2020
Paragraphe
Protection of journalists and press freedom 2010, para. 23
- Paragraph text
- In addition, the Special Rapporteur emphasizes the importance for journalists to be alert to the danger of discrimination being furthered by the media, and to do the utmost to avoid facilitating such discrimination based on, inter alia, race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth or other status. In this regard, the Special Rapporteur notes that, in accordance with international human rights law, any expression of national, racial or religious hatred that constitutes incitement to discrimination, hostility or violence should be prohibited, as should the dissemination of ideas based on racial superiority or hatred. Moreover, the Special Rapporteur encourages journalists to promote, through their work, a deeper understanding of racial, cultural and religious diversity, and to contribute to developing better intercultural relationships.
- Organe
- Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of the right to freedom of opinion and expression
- Type de document
- Special Procedures' report
- Thèmes
- Equality & Inclusion
- Social & Cultural Rights
- Année
- 2010
- Date de modification
- 21 sept. 2020
Paragraphe
Protection of journalists and press freedom 2010, para. 49
- Paragraph text
- Most important, as civilians, journalists are protected against direct attacks unless and for such time as they take direct part in hostilities. Violations of this rule constitute a grave breach of the Geneva Conventions and Additional Protocol I, and an intentional attack against a civilian also amounts to a war crime under the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, in both international and non international armed conflicts. With regard to acts amounting to direct participation in hostilities, the Special Rapporteur would like to stress that, as clarified by the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC), three cumulative requirements must be met: (a) the act must be likely to adversely affect the military operations or military capacity of a party to an armed conflict or, alternatively, to inflict death, injury or destruction on persons or objects protected against direct attack (threshold of harm); (b) there must be a direct causal link between the act and the harm likely to result either from that act or from a coordinated military operation of which the act constitutes an integral part (direct causation); and (c) the act must be specifically designed to directly cause the required threshold of harm in support of a party to the conflict and to the detriment of another (belligerent nexus). Hence, journalists performing tasks in the conduct of their profession, such as recording videos, taking photographs or recording information solely for the purpose of informing the public, are not considered as direct participants in hostilities, and thus do not lose their protection as civilians under international humanitarian law.
- Organe
- Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of the right to freedom of opinion and expression
- Type de document
- Special Procedures' report
- Thèmes
- Humanitarian
- Année
- 2010
- Date de modification
- 21 sept. 2020
Paragraphe
Protection of journalists and press freedom 2010, para. 48
- Paragraph text
- International humanitarian law protects journalists and other media professionals in times of armed conflict. In an international armed conflict, a journalist is entitled to all rights and protection granted to civilians, as stipulated in article 79 of the Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and relating to the Protection of Victims of International Armed Conflicts (Protocol I). The same protection also applies to non-international armed conflicts during which journalists are considered to be civilians by virtue of customary international law. Hence, although there are only two explicit references to media personnel under international humanitarian law (article 79 of Additional Protocol I, regarding journalists engaged in dangerous professional missions in areas of armed conflict, and article 4A(4) of the Geneva Convention relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War (Third Geneva Convention), regarding, inter alia, war correspondents), all provisions related to the protection of civilians in the four Geneva Conventions and the Additional Protocols thereto are applicable to journalists.
- Organe
- Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of the right to freedom of opinion and expression
- Type de document
- Special Procedures' report
- Thèmes
- Governance & Rule of Law
- Humanitarian
- Année
- 2010
- Date de modification
- 21 sept. 2020
Paragraphe
Protection of journalists and press freedom 2010, para. 90
- Paragraph text
- As restrictive national laws are used to justify harassment and interference with citizen journalists' freedom of expression, the Special Rapporteur urges States to fulfil their international human rights obligations by ensuring that legal provisions that criminalize freedom of expression, whether in the penal code, press law or elsewhere, are in conformity with international legal standards. When promulgating Internet-specific laws, States must ensure that they comply with article 19 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and the Universal Declaration on Human Rights.
- Organe
- Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of the right to freedom of opinion and expression
- Type de document
- Special Procedures' report
- Thèmes
- Civil & Political Rights
- Equality & Inclusion
- Governance & Rule of Law
- Année
- 2010
- Date de modification
- 21 sept. 2020
Paragraphe
Protection of journalists and press freedom 2010, para. 38
- Paragraph text
- The obligation to fulfil or to facilitate the enjoyment of the right to freedom of expression requires States to take positive and proactive measures, including, for example, allocating sufficient attention and resources to prevent attacks against journalists and taking special measures to address such attacks, including providing protection for journalists. It also encompasses the obligation to create conditions to prevent violations of the right to freedom of expression, including by ensuring that relevant national legislation complies with their international human rights obligations and is effectively implemented.
- Organe
- Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of the right to freedom of opinion and expression
- Type de document
- Special Procedures' report
- Thèmes
- Civil & Political Rights
- Equality & Inclusion
- Governance & Rule of Law
- Année
- 2010
- Date de modification
- 21 sept. 2020
Paragraphe
Protection of journalists and press freedom 2010, para. 51
- Paragraph text
- In the case of non-international armed conflicts, there is no distinction between war correspondents and other journalists under international humanitarian law, and the protection for all journalists emanates from common article 3 of the Geneva Conventions and the Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and relating to the Protection of Victims of Non-International Armed Conflicts (Protocol II). This includes, for example, protection from violence to life, health and physical or mental well-being, including torture, hostage-taking, humiliating and degrading treatment, as well as threats to commit such acts. They are also entitled to fair trial guarantees (articles 4, 5, 6 of Additional Protocol II). The Special Rapporteur would like to emphasize that violations of most of these provisions are punishable as war crimes.
- Organe
- Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of the right to freedom of opinion and expression
- Type de document
- Special Procedures' report
- Thèmes
- Governance & Rule of Law
- Humanitarian
- Année
- 2010
- Date de modification
- 21 sept. 2020
Paragraphe
Protection of journalists and press freedom 2010, para. 62
- Paragraph text
- In times of armed conflict, internal disturbance or natural disaster, ordinary citizens may become engaged in reporting activities. Such persons are usually referred to as "citizen journalists". While there is no universal definition of citizen journalism as such, the concept is usually understood as independent reporting, often by amateurs on the scene of an event, which is disseminated globally through modern media, most often the Internet (for example, through photo- or video-sharing sites, blogs, microblogs, online forums, message boards, social networks, podcasts, and so forth). New technologies have provided unprecedented access to means of global communication, and have therefore introduced new means of reporting on news and events around the world.
- Organe
- Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of the right to freedom of opinion and expression
- Type de document
- Special Procedures' report
- Thèmes
- Humanitarian
- Année
- 2010
- Date de modification
- 21 sept. 2020
Paragraphe
Protection of journalists and press freedom 2010, para. 52
- Paragraph text
- The Special Rapporteur would like to highlight the fact that, in addition to being afforded protection under international humanitarian law as civilians, journalists and other media professionals are protected under international human rights law even during armed conflict. Indeed, as emphasized by, inter alia, the Human Rights Committee, in situations of armed conflict, international humanitarian law and international human rights law are not mutually exclusive, but complementary. As such the obligation of States to respect, protect and fulfil the right of all individuals to freedom of expression, as well as their right to life, liberty and security (see section III.B above), continue to apply during armed conflict alongside international humanitarian law.
- Organe
- Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of the right to freedom of opinion and expression
- Type de document
- Special Procedures' report
- Thèmes
- Governance & Rule of Law
- Humanitarian
- Année
- 2010
- Date de modification
- 21 sept. 2020
Paragraphe
Protection of journalists and press freedom 2010, para. 88
- Paragraph text
- Given that in at least 4 of every 10 cases involving the murder of journalists, the victims receive threats before being killed, the Special Rapporteur urges all Governments to investigate such threats and ensure effective protection, for example through witness protection programmes. In this regard, the Special Rapporteur notes that detailed guidelines and recommendations have been set out in the report of the Special Rapporteur on extrajudicial, summary and arbitrary executions (see A/63/313), the reports of the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights on the right to the truth (A/HRC/12/19 and A/HRC/15/33) and the analytical study on human rights and transitional justice (A/HRC/12/18).
- Organe
- Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of the right to freedom of opinion and expression
- Type de document
- Special Procedures' report
- Thèmes
- Civil & Political Rights
- Governance & Rule of Law
- Année
- 2010
- Date de modification
- 21 sept. 2020
Paragraphe
Groups in need of attention, limitations to the right to freedom of expression, and protection of journalists 2010, para. 66
- Paragraph text
- The right to freedom of opinion and expression includes the freedom for minority and excluded groups to give, receive and transmit information. Community-based media are effective ways to accomplish that, and it is the duty of Governments to assist and support them in doing so and to ensure equitable access. The Special Rapporteur reiterates the call to Governments, made in paragraph 3 of the relevant section of the Colombo Declaration, to "develop national policies that address access to, and participation in, information and communication for people living in poverty, including access to licenses and fair spectrum allocation".
- Organe
- Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of the right to freedom of opinion and expression
- Type de document
- Special Procedures' report
- Thèmes
- Equality & Inclusion
- Poverty
- Année
- 2010
- Date de modification
- 21 sept. 2020
Paragraphe
Key trends and challenges to the right of all individuals to seek, receive and impart information and ideas of all kinds through the Internet 2011, para. 52
- Paragraph text
- In the United States of America, the Senate unanimously passed the "Twenty-first Century Communications and Video Accessibility Act" in 2010. The Act seeks to ensure full access for users who are deaf, hard of hearing, late deafened or deaf-blind to evolving high-speed broadband, wireless and other Internet protocol technologies. Moreover, the Act stipulates that accessibility features are preserved when materials are offered online, that telephones used over the Internet must be compatible with hearing aids and that television programmes must also be captioned when delivered over the Internet.
- Organe
- Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of the right to freedom of opinion and expression
- Type de document
- Special Procedures' report
- Thèmes
- Equality & Inclusion
- Health
- Année
- 2011
- Date de modification
- 21 sept. 2020
Paragraphe
The right to freedom of opinion and expression exercised through the Internet 2011, para. 29
- Paragraph text
- Blocking refers to measures taken to prevent certain content from reaching an end-user. This includes preventing users from accessing specific websites, Internet Protocol (IP) addresses, domain name extensions, the taking down of websites from the web server where they are hosted, or using filtering technologies to exclude pages containing keywords or other specific content from appearing. For example, several countries continue to block access to YouTube, a video-sharing website on which users can upload, share and view videos. China, which has in place one of the most sophisticated and extensive systems for controlling information on the Internet, has adopted extensive filtering systems that block access to websites containing key terms such as "democracy" and "human rights". The Special Rapporteur is deeply concerned that mechanisms used to regulate and censor information on the Internet are increasingly sophisticated, with multi-layered controls that are often hidden from the public.
- Organe
- Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of the right to freedom of opinion and expression
- Type de document
- Special Procedures' report
- Thèmes
- Civil & Political Rights
- Equality & Inclusion
- Governance & Rule of Law
- Année
- 2011
- Date de modification
- 21 sept. 2020
Paragraphe
The right to freedom of opinion and expression exercised through the Internet 2011, para. 33
- Paragraph text
- The types of action taken by States to limit the dissemination of content online not only include measures to prevent information from reaching the end-user, but also direct targeting of those who seek, receive and impart politically sensitive information via the Internet. Physically silencing criticism or dissent through arbitrary arrests and detention, enforced disappearance, harassment and intimidation is an old phenomenon, and also applies to Internet users. This issue has been explored in the Special Rapporteur's report to the General Assembly under the section on "protection of citizen journalists" (A/65/284). Such actions are often aimed not only to silence legitimate expression, but also to intimidate a population to push its members towards self-censorship.
- Organe
- Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of the right to freedom of opinion and expression
- Type de document
- Special Procedures' report
- Thèmes
- Civil & Political Rights
- Governance & Rule of Law
- Année
- 2011
- Date de modification
- 21 sept. 2020
Paragraphe
The right to freedom of opinion and expression exercised through the Internet 2011, para. 30
- Paragraph text
- The Special Rapporteur is also concerned by the emerging trend of timed (or "just-in-time") blocking to prevent users from accessing or disseminating information at key political moments, such as elections, times of social unrest, or anniversaries of politically or historically significant events. During such times, websites of opposition parties, independent media, and social networking platforms such as Twitter and Facebook are blocked, as witnessed in the context of recent protests across the Middle East and North African region. In Egypt, users were disconnected entirely from Internet access.
- Organe
- Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of the right to freedom of opinion and expression
- Type de document
- Special Procedures' report
- Thèmes
- Civil & Political Rights
- Governance & Rule of Law
- Année
- 2011
- Date de modification
- 21 sept. 2020
Paragraphe
The right to freedom of opinion and expression exercised through the Internet 2011, para. 70
- Paragraph text
- The Special Rapporteur is deeply concerned by increasingly sophisticated blocking or filtering mechanisms used by States for censorship. The lack of transparency surrounding these measures also makes it difficult to ascertain whether blocking or filtering is really necessary for the purported aims put forward by States. As such, the Special Rapporteur calls upon States that currently block websites to provide lists of blocked websites and full details regarding the necessity and justification for blocking each individual website. An explanation should also be provided on the affected websites as to why they have been blocked. Any determination on what content should be blocked must be undertaken by a competent judicial authority or a body which is independent of any political, commercial, or other unwarranted influences.
- Organe
- Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of the right to freedom of opinion and expression
- Type de document
- Special Procedures' report
- Thèmes
- Governance & Rule of Law
- Année
- 2011
- Date de modification
- 21 sept. 2020
Paragraphe
The right to freedom of opinion and expression exercised through the Internet 2011, para. 65
- Paragraph text
- In some economically developed States, Internet access has been recognized as a right. For example, the parliament of Estonia passed legislation in 2000 declaring Internet access a basic human right. The constitutional council of France effectively declared Internet access a fundamental right in 2009, and the constitutional court of Costa Rica reached a similar decision in 2010. Going a step further, Finland passed a decree in 2009 stating that every Internet connection needs to have a speed of at least one Megabit per second (broadband level). The Special Rapporteur also takes note that according to a survey by the British Broadcasting Corporation in March 2010, 79% of those interviewed in 26 countries believe that Internet access is a fundamental human right.
- Organe
- Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of the right to freedom of opinion and expression
- Type de document
- Special Procedures' report
- Thèmes
- Equality & Inclusion
- Governance & Rule of Law
- Année
- 2011
- Date de modification
- 21 sept. 2020
Paragraphe
The right to freedom of opinion and expression exercised through the Internet 2011, para. 51
- Paragraph text
- Cyber-attacks, or attempts to undermine or compromise the function of a computer-based system, include measures such as hacking into accounts or computer networks, and often take the form of distributed denial of service (DDoS) attacks. During such attacks, a group of computers is used to inundate a web server where the targeted website is hosted with requests, and as a result, the targeted website crashes and becomes inaccessible for a certain period of time. As with timed blocking, such attacks are sometimes undertaken during key political moments. The Special Rapporteur also notes that websites of human rights organizations and dissidents are frequently and increasingly becoming targets of DDoS attacks, some of which are included in the first addendum to this report.
- Organe
- Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of the right to freedom of opinion and expression
- Type de document
- Special Procedures' report
- Thèmes
- Humanitarian
- Violence
- Année
- 2011
- Date de modification
- 21 sept. 2020
Paragraphe
Hate speech and incitement to hatred 2012, para. 70
- Paragraph text
- While the swiftly evolving electronic media landscape has led to a dramatic increase in the volume of information available, the quality of information has not always kept pace. An objective, ethical and informative media therefore remains essential to informing society about contentious societal issues in a balanced manner and to preventing individuals from falling prey to promises of easy solutions and extremist rhetoric. Caution exercised by the media is also essential to preventing the drawing of any unnecessary attention to acts of an extremist individual that can spark violence. For example, when an obscure pastor in the United States threatened to burn the Koran in September 2010, the media played a negative role in unnecessarily drawing attention to the story. Had greater care been taken in reporting on the incident, some of the violence that ensued might have been averted.
- Organe
- Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of the right to freedom of opinion and expression
- Type de document
- Special Procedures' report
- Thèmes
- Humanitarian
- Violence
- Année
- 2012
- Date de modification
- 21 sept. 2020
Paragraphe
Hate speech and incitement to hatred 2012, para. 28
- Paragraph text
- Asia and the Middle East have seen killings of presidents of the Ahmadiyya community in Pakistan following a television broadcast during which two maulanas stated that the Ahmadiyya community was deserving of death; incitement by a Government-appointed imam in Saudi Arabia to eliminate all Shia believers in the world; incitement to and acts of violence against the Sufi community in Sri Lanka; increased radicalization and serious instances of incitement to racism in Israel against the Arab population, in addition to acts of violence by Jewish settlers against Muslims; and incitement to religious hatred against Jews in the occupied Palestinian territory.
- Organe
- Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of the right to freedom of opinion and expression
- Type de document
- Special Procedures' report
- Année
- 2012
- Date de modification
- 21 sept. 2020
Paragraphe
Hate speech and incitement to hatred 2012, para. 78
- Paragraph text
- Given that blasphemy laws do not comply with the above-mentioned criteria, the Special Rapporteur urges States to repeal them and to replace them with laws protecting individuals' right to freedom of religion or belief in accordance with international human rights standards. In addition, any law that provides for disproportionate sanctions for the expression of opinions, such as the death penalty, should be repealed immediately. Similarly, the Special Rapporteur calls upon States to repeal laws that prohibit discussion of historic events. Just as religion, history should always be open to discussion and debate.
- Organe
- Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of the right to freedom of opinion and expression
- Type de document
- Special Procedures' report
- Thèmes
- Equality & Inclusion
- Social & Cultural Rights
- Année
- 2012
- Date de modification
- 21 sept. 2020
Paragraphe
Protection of journalists and media freedom 2012, para. 90
- Paragraph text
- The Special Rapporteur emphasizes the importance of journalists' right to access information, which is part of the right to seek and receive information under articles 19 of the Universal Declaration on Human Rights and the International Covenant on Civil and political Rights, respectively. He would like to stress that Governments should classify only those data which are proven to harm national security and other vital interests of the State. Moreover, there should be clear classification criteria and register of classified information, which is both established by law and accessible to everyone. Further, classified data should be subject to regular review and declassified if confidentiality is no longer necessary.
- Organe
- Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of the right to freedom of opinion and expression
- Type de document
- Special Procedures' report
- Thèmes
- Equality & Inclusion
- Governance & Rule of Law
- Année
- 2012
- Date de modification
- 21 sept. 2020
Paragraphe
Hate speech and incitement to hatred 2012, para. 55
- Paragraph text
- With regard to discussion of history, the Special Rapporteur is of the view that historical events should be open to discussion and, as stated by the Human Rights Committee, laws that penalize the expression of opinions about historical facts are incompatible with the obligations that the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights imposes on States parties in relation to the respect for freedom of opinion and expression (CCPR/C/GC/34, para. 49). By demanding that writers, journalists and citizens give only a version of events that is approved by the Government, States are enabled to subjugate freedom of expression to official versions of events.
- Organe
- Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of the right to freedom of opinion and expression
- Type de document
- Special Procedures' report
- Thèmes
- Civil & Political Rights
- Equality & Inclusion
- Governance & Rule of Law
- Social & Cultural Rights
- Année
- 2012
- Date de modification
- 21 sept. 2020
Paragraphe
Protection of journalists and media freedom 2012, para. 110
- Paragraph text
- The Special Rapporteur recognizes efforts in countries, such as Colombia and Mexico, to create bodies to offer, inter alia, greater protection to journalists. The Special Rapporteur underlines the importance of the willingness and ability of such bodies to take on a broad range and high number of cases and issues under its competency; to work with autonomy; to have their own and sufficient resources and to have the capacity to coordinate between different authorities. Furthermore, the Special Rapporteur recommends that journalists and civil society organizations participate in the design, integration, functioning and evaluation of these bodies; that they have investigatory powers; that they have the competency to make recommendations to the Governments of their respective countries; that risk-assessment is prompt and efficient; that measures are implemented promptly; and that a contextual approach is adopted. Protection measures must be holistic, including a range of physical, legal, and political measures.
- Organe
- Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of the right to freedom of opinion and expression
- Type de document
- Special Procedures' report
- Thèmes
- Equality & Inclusion
- Governance & Rule of Law
- Année
- 2012
- Date de modification
- 21 sept. 2020
Paragraphe
Protection of journalists and media freedom 2012, para. 56
- Paragraph text
- Despite the existence of provisions in international human rights law which protect their right to seek, receive and impart information and ideas of all kinds, journalists across the world continue to face risks and challenges in carrying out their work. The Special Rapporteur reiterates that the problem with regard to continued and increasing violence against journalists is not a lack of legal standards, but the lack of implementation of existing norms and standards (A/65/284, para. 83). It is therefore essential that these existing norms and standards be implemented at the national level. The Special Rapporteur wishes to emphasize again that although the origin of the acts of violence may not initially be known, the primary responsibility of protecting journalists, fully investigating each case and prosecuting those responsible lies with Governments and State institutions (A/HRC/4/27).
- Organe
- Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of the right to freedom of opinion and expression
- Type de document
- Special Procedures' report
- Thèmes
- Governance & Rule of Law
- Violence
- Année
- 2012
- Date de modification
- 21 sept. 2020
Paragraphe
Protection of journalists and media freedom 2012, para. 61
- Paragraph text
- Most of the offline media have developed an online alternative, and given that the Internet has become an essential and economic medium for disseminating news to a global audience, leading to an emergence of "online journalists" - both professionals and so-called "citizen journalists" who are untrained, but who play an increasingly important role by documenting and disseminating news as they unfold on the ground. Such an expansion of individuals involved in spreading information has enriched the media landscape by increasing access to sources of information, stimulating informed analysis and promoting the expression of diverse opinions, particularly in moments of crises.
- Organe
- Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of the right to freedom of opinion and expression
- Type de document
- Special Procedures' report
- Thèmes
- Governance & Rule of Law
- Humanitarian
- Année
- 2012
- Date de modification
- 21 sept. 2020
Paragraphe
Protection of journalists and media freedom 2012, para. 83
- Paragraph text
- Defamation laws protect an individual's reputation from false and malicious attacks, and constitute valid grounds for restricting freedom of expression. Nearly all countries have some form of defamation legislation, although different terms are used, such as libel, calumny, slander, insult, desacato, or lèse majesté. However, the problem with defamation cases is that they frequently mask the determination of political and economic powers to retaliate against criticisms or allegations of mismanagement or corruption, and to exert undue pressure on the media.
- Organe
- Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of the right to freedom of opinion and expression
- Type de document
- Special Procedures' report
- Thèmes
- Civil & Political Rights
- Equality & Inclusion
- Governance & Rule of Law
- Année
- 2012
- Date de modification
- 21 sept. 2020
Paragraphe
Protection of journalists and media freedom 2012, para. 115
- Paragraph text
- The Special Rapporteur encourages coordination between United Nations agencies and initiatives, such as the United Nations joint Plan of Action on the Protection of Journalists and the Issue of Impunity. Greater coordination between United Nations agencies, in terms of funding and programmes, may result in more efficient use of resources and less duplication of work. The Special Rapporteur welcomes the fact that civil society was consulted as part of the initiative and encourages strengthened links between United Nations agencies and civil society in the protection of journalists.
- Organe
- Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of the right to freedom of opinion and expression
- Type de document
- Special Procedures' report
- Thèmes
- Governance & Rule of Law
- Année
- 2012
- Date de modification
- 21 sept. 2020
Paragraphe
The right to access information 2013, para. 22
- Paragraph text
- Notably, article 6 of the Declaration on the Right and Responsibility of Individuals, Groups and Organs of Society to Promote and Protect Universally Recognized Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (known also as the Declaration on Human Rights Defenders), adopted by the General Assembly in resolution 53/144, expressly provides for access to information on human rights, stating that everyone has the right, individually and in association with others, (a) to know, seek, obtain, receive and hold information about all human rights and fundamental freedoms, including having access to information as to how these rights and freedoms are given effect in domestic legislative, judicial or administrative systems; and (b) as provided for in human rights and other applicable international instruments, freely to publish, impart or disseminate to others views, information and knowledge on all human rights and fundamental freedoms.
- Organe
- Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of the right to freedom of opinion and expression
- Type de document
- Special Procedures' report
- Thèmes
- Civil & Political Rights
- Equality & Inclusion
- Governance & Rule of Law
- Année
- 2013
- Date de modification
- 21 sept. 2020
Paragraphe
The right to access information 2013, para. 69
- Paragraph text
- Furthermore, the Special Rapporteur has highlighted the fact that, under no circumstances, may journalists, members of the media or members of civil society who have access to and distribute classified information on alleged violation of human rights be subjected to subsequent punishment. Equally, confidential sources and materials relating to the disclosure of classified information must be protected by law. In this context, journalistic self-regulatory mechanisms and codes can significantly contribute to drawing attention to eventual risks in the communication of complex and sensitive issues.
- Organe
- Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of the right to freedom of opinion and expression
- Type de document
- Special Procedures' report
- Thèmes
- Civil & Political Rights
- Equality & Inclusion
- Governance & Rule of Law
- Année
- 2013
- Date de modification
- 21 sept. 2020
Paragraphe