Astuces de recherche
trié par
30 Listé sur un total de 1861 Entités
11 columns hidden
Titre | Date ajouter | Modèle | Organe | Status juridique | Type de document | Année | Code du document | Document | Paragraph text | Thematics | Thèmes | Personnes concernées | Année |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Accession to International Instruments and their Implementation | 19 août 2019 | Document | Comité exécutif du programme du Haut Commissaire des Nations Unies pour les réfugiés | Droit souple négocié | Conclusion du Comité exécutif | 1986 | |||||||
Accession to International Instruments and their Implementation 1986, para. (a) | 19 août 2019 | Paragraph | Executive Committee of the Programme of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees | Negotiated soft law | ExCom Conclusion | Recalled that in numerous earlier conclusions the Executive Committee had appealed to States to accede to the 1951 United Nations Convention and the 1967 Protocol relating to the Status of Refugees and that similar appeals had also been addressed to Governments in various resolutions of the United Nations General Assembly; |
|
| 1986 | ||||
Accession to International Instruments and their Implementation 1986, para. (b) | 19 août 2019 | Paragraph | Executive Committee of the Programme of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees | Negotiated soft law | ExCom Conclusion | Noted with satisfaction that more than 100 States had now become parties to the 1951 Convention and/or the 1967 Protocol; |
|
| 1986 | ||||
Accession to International Instruments and their Implementation 1986, para. (c) | 19 août 2019 | Paragraph | Executive Committee of the Programme of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees | Negotiated soft law | ExCom Conclusion | Recognized that these instruments incorporate fundamental principles of refugee law including the principle of non-refoulement and lay down minimum standards for the treatment of refugees and thus constitute the corner-stone of international protection; |
|
| 1986 | ||||
Accession to International Instruments and their Implementation 1986, para. (d) | 19 août 2019 | Paragraph | Executive Committee of the Programme of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees | Negotiated soft law | ExCom Conclusion | Stressed that accession to the 1951 Convention and the 1967 Protocol implies a commitment to and a reinforcement of the fundamental principles which these instruments embody, underlines the importance attached by each acceding State to international efforts to solve refugee problems and reflects the universal character that the refugee problem has now assumed; |
|
| 1986 | ||||
Accession to International Instruments and their Implementation 1986, para. (e) | 19 août 2019 | Paragraph | Executive Committee of the Programme of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees | Negotiated soft law | ExCom Conclusion | Recognized that widespread accession to these instruments reaffirms their universal applicability and serves to reinforce the international legal framework for the protection of refugees and thereby facilitates the exercise of the High Commissioner's international protection function; |
|
| 1986 | ||||
Accession to International Instruments and their Implementation 1986, para. (f) | 19 août 2019 | Paragraph | Executive Committee of the Programme of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees | Negotiated soft law | ExCom Conclusion | Called on States not having acceded to the 1951 United Nations Convention and the 1967 Protocol relating to the Status of Refugees to accede to these instruments; |
|
| 1986 | ||||
Accession to International Instruments and their Implementation 1986, para. (g) | 19 août 2019 | Paragraph | Executive Committee of the Programme of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees | Negotiated soft law | ExCom Conclusion | Recommended consideration of the withdrawal of the geographical limitation and reservations to these instruments by those States which still maintain them; |
|
| 1986 | ||||
Accession to International Instruments and their Implementation 1986, para. (h) | 19 août 2019 | Paragraph | Executive Committee of the Programme of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees | Negotiated soft law | ExCom Conclusion | Recalled that the 1951 Convention and the 1967 Protocol are complemented by various international instruments of relevance to refugees adopted at the universal level as well as by a number of standard setting instruments adopted at the regional level and called upon States to consider acceding to such additional universal instruments and to such other instruments as are applicable to their region; |
|
| 1986 | ||||
Accession to International Instruments and their Implementation 1986, para. (i) | 19 août 2019 | Paragraph | Executive Committee of the Programme of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees | Negotiated soft law | ExCom Conclusion | Noted that accession to the various international refugee instruments, whether of a universal or regional character, is now of utmost importance in view of the magnitude and the seriousness of the contemporary refugee problem and requested the High Commissioner to continue his efforts at the highest level to promote further accession to the international refugee instruments; |
|
| 1986 | ||||
Accession to International Instruments and their Implementation 1986, para. (j) | 19 août 2019 | Paragraph | Executive Committee of the Programme of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees | Negotiated soft law | ExCom Conclusion | Recommended to States which have not yet done so, to consider adopting appropriate legislative and/or administrative measures for the effective implementation of the international refugee instruments, making the necessary distinction between refugees and other aliens. |
|
| 1986 | ||||
Asylum | 19 août 2019 | Document | Comité exécutif du programme du Haut Commissaire des Nations Unies pour les réfugiés | Droit souple négocié | Conclusion du Comité exécutif | 1977 | |||||||
Asylum 1977, para. (a) | 19 août 2019 | Paragraph | Executive Committee of the Programme of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees | Negotiated soft law | ExCom Conclusion | Noted with satisfaction the report of the High Commissioner that States have generally continued to follow liberal asylum practices; |
|
| 1977 | ||||
Asylum 1977, para. (b) | 19 août 2019 | Paragraph | Executive Committee of the Programme of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees | Negotiated soft law | ExCom Conclusion | Concerned, however, that according to the report of the High Commissioner cases continue to occur in which asylum-seekers have encountered serious difficulties in finding a country willing to grant them even temporary refuge and that refusal of permanent or temporary asylum has led in a number of cases to serious consequences for the persons concerned; |
|
| 1977 | ||||
Asylum 1977, para. (c) | 19 août 2019 | Paragraph | Executive Committee of the Programme of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees | Negotiated soft law | ExCom Conclusion | Requested the High Commissioner to draw the attention of Governments to the various international instruments existing in the field of asylum and reiterated the fundamental importance of these instruments from a humanitarian standpoint; |
|
| 1977 | ||||
Asylum 1977, para. (d) | 19 août 2019 | Paragraph | Executive Committee of the Programme of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees | Negotiated soft law | ExCom Conclusion | Appealed to Governments to follow, or continue to follow, liberal practices in granting permanent or at least temporary asylum to refugees who have come directly to their territory; |
|
| 1977 | ||||
Asylum 1977, para. (e) | 19 août 2019 | Paragraph | Executive Committee of the Programme of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees | Negotiated soft law | ExCom Conclusion | Called on Governments to co-operate, in a spirit of international solidarity, with the High Commissioner in the performance of his functions-especially with respect to asylum-in accordance with General Assembly Resolution 428(V) of 14 December 1950. |
|
| 1977 | ||||
Central American Refugees and the Cartagena Declaration | 19 août 2019 | Document | Comité exécutif du programme du Haut Commissaire des Nations Unies pour les réfugiés | Droit souple négocié | Conclusion du Comité exécutif | 1985 | |||||||
Central American Refugees and the Cartagena Declaration 1985, para. (a) | 19 août 2019 | Paragraph | Executive Committee of the Programme of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees | Negotiated soft law | ExCom Conclusion | Recognized the complexity and gravity of the refugees situation in the Central American region which has recently received special attention; |
|
| 1985 | ||||
Central American Refugees and the Cartagena Declaration 1985, para. (b) | 19 août 2019 | Paragraph | Executive Committee of the Programme of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees | Negotiated soft law | ExCom Conclusion | Acknowledged the provisions relating to refugees in the Contadora Act for Peace and Co-operation in Central America; |
|
| 1985 | ||||
Central American Refugees and the Cartagena Declaration 1985, para. (c) | 19 août 2019 | Paragraph | Executive Committee of the Programme of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees | Negotiated soft law | ExCom Conclusion | Noted with interest the Cartagena Declaration, embodying the conclusions of the Colloquium on International Protection of Refugees in Central America, Mexico and Panama: Juridical and Humanitarian Problems, held in Cartagena, Colombia from 19 to 22 November 1984, under the auspices of the Government of the Republic of Colombia; |
|
| 1985 | ||||
Central American Refugees and the Cartagena Declaration 1985, para. (d) | 19 août 2019 | Paragraph | Executive Committee of the Programme of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees | Negotiated soft law | ExCom Conclusion | Welcomed the use of regional approaches in resolving refugee problems of regional scope, as amply demonstrated by the Colloquium. |
|
| 1985 | ||||
Cessation of Status | 19 août 2019 | Document | Comité exécutif du programme du Haut Commissaire des Nations Unies pour les réfugiés | Droit souple négocié | Conclusion du Comité exécutif | 1992 | |||||||
Cessation of Status 1992, para. (a) | 19 août 2019 | Paragraph | Executive Committee of the Programme of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees | Negotiated soft law | ExCom Conclusion | Stresses that, in taking any decision on application of the cessation clauses based on "ceased circumstances", States must carefully assess the fundamental character of the changes in the country of nationality or origin, including the general human rights situation, as well as the particular cause of fear of persecution, in order to make sure in an objective and verifiable way that the situation which justified the granting of refugee status has ceased to exist; |
|
| 1992 | ||||
Cessation of Status 1992, para. (b) | 19 août 2019 | Paragraph | Executive Committee of the Programme of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees | Negotiated soft law | ExCom Conclusion | Underlines that an essential element in such assessment by States is the fundamental, stable and durable character of the changes, making use of appropriate information available in this respect, inter alia, from relevant specialized bodies, including particularly UNHCR; |
|
| 1992 | ||||
Cessation of Status 1992, para. (c) | 19 août 2019 | Paragraph | Executive Committee of the Programme of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees | Negotiated soft law | ExCom Conclusion | Emphasizes that the "ceased circumstances" cessation clauses shall not apply to refugees who continue to have a well-founded fear of persecution; |
|
| 1992 | ||||
Cessation of Status 1992, para. (d) | 19 août 2019 | Paragraph | Executive Committee of the Programme of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees | Negotiated soft law | ExCom Conclusion | Recognizes therefore that all refugees affected by a group or class decision to apply these cessation clauses must have the possibility, upon request, to have such application in their cases reconsidered on grounds relevant to their individual case; |
|
| 1992 | ||||
Cessation of Status 1992, para. (e) | 19 août 2019 | Paragraph | Executive Committee of the Programme of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees | Negotiated soft law | ExCom Conclusion | Recommends, so as to avoid hardship cases, that States seriously consider an appropriate status, preserving previously acquired rights, for persons who have compelling reasons arising out of previous persecution for refusing to re-avail themselves of the protection of their country and recommends also that appropriate arrangements, which would not put into jeopardy their established situation, be similarly considered by relevant authorities for those persons who cannot be expected to leave the country of asylum, due to a long stay in that country resulting in strong family, social and economic links there; |
|
| 1992 | ||||
Cessation of Status 1992, para. (f) | 19 août 2019 | Paragraph | Executive Committee of the Programme of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees | Negotiated soft law | ExCom Conclusion | Recommends that States, in giving effect to a decision to invoke the cessation clauses, should in all situations deal humanely with the consequences for the affected individuals or groups, and that countries of asylum and countries of origin should together facilitate the return, to assure that it takes place in a fair and dignified manner. Where appropriate, return and reintegration assistance should be made available to the returnees by the international community, including through relevant international agencies. |
|
| 1992 | ||||
Cessation of Status 1992, para. 1 | 19 août 2019 | Paragraph | Executive Committee of the Programme of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees | Negotiated soft law | ExCom Conclusion | Recalling Conclusion No. 65 (XLII) which, inter alia, underlined the possibility of use of the cessation clauses in Article IC (5) and (6) of the 1951 Convention in situations where a change of circumstances in a country is of such a profound and enduring nature that refugees from that country no longer require international protection, and can no longer continue to refuse to avail themselves of the protection of their country, provided that it is recognized that compelling reasons may, for certain individuals, support the continuation of refugee status. |
|
| 1992 |