Search Tips
trié par
30 Listé sur un total de 1073 Entités
Access to justice and the right to food: the way forward
- Organe
- Rapporteur spécial sur le droit à l'alimentation
- Status juridique
- Droit souple non-négocié
- Type de document
- Rapport des procédures spéciales
- Année
- 2015
- Code du document
- A/HRC/28/65
Document
Access to justice and the right to food: the way forward 2015, para. 2
- Paragraph text
- The right to food was first recognized in article 25 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Since then it has been recognized in a number of international instruments, with the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (hereinafter "the Covenant") representing the most significant treaty on the right to food. The Covenant (to date ratified by 162 States) has been vital in shaping and developing the normative framework on the right to food. The treaty defines the right to food as a distinct and fundamental right to be free from hunger and to have sustainable access to food (art. 11). It outlines specific obligations for all States parties to take measures to progressively attain the full realization of the right to food.
- Organe
- Special Rapporteur on the right to food
- Type de document
- Special Procedures' report
- Thèmes
- Equality & Inclusion
- Food & Nutrition
- Governance & Rule of Law
- Personnes concernées
- All
- Année
- 2015
Paragraphe
Access to justice and the right to food: the way forward 2015, para. 3
- Paragraph text
- In the wake of the momentum generated by the 1996 World Food Summit, which highlighted the need to further "clarify the content of the right to adequate food and the fundamental right of everyone to be free from hunger", the Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights in 1999 adopted general comment No. 12 on the right to adequate food (hereinafter, "general comment No. 12") which clarifies the implications of three levels of State obligation, including the obligation to respect, protect and fulfil (paras. 14 and 15).
- Organe
- Special Rapporteur on the right to food
- Type de document
- Special Procedures' report
- Thèmes
- Equality & Inclusion
- Food & Nutrition
- Governance & Rule of Law
- Personnes concernées
- All
- Année
- 2015
Paragraphe
Access to justice and the right to food: the way forward 2015, para. 4
- Paragraph text
- In addition to legally binding treaties, the right to food has also been enunciated in various international standards, the most significant of which are the Voluntary Guidelines to Support the Progressive Realization of the Right to Adequate Food in the Context of National Food Security (Right to Food Guidelines). The Right to Food Guidelines were developed as a practical tool for States to assist them in implementing their obligations at the domestic level under article 11 of the Covenant. The year 2014 marked the tenth anniversary of the guidelines and provided an opportunity to evaluate the impact thereof on national implementation. The present report will highlight some examples of good practice in that regard.
- Organe
- Special Rapporteur on the right to food
- Type de document
- Special Procedures' report
- Thèmes
- Food & Nutrition
- Governance & Rule of Law
- Personnes concernées
- All
- N.A.
- Année
- 2015
Paragraphe
Access to justice and the right to food: the way forward 2015, para. 5
- Paragraph text
- While some critics suggest that the voluntary nature of the Right to Food Guidelines limits their usefulness, they were adopted by member States of the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) by consensus. States cannot therefore claim to be unaware of or refuse to comply with the guidelines. Over the years, in many formal settings, the Governments have reiterated their commitment to and support for the guidelines.
- Organe
- Special Rapporteur on the right to food
- Type de document
- Special Procedures' report
- Thèmes
- Equality & Inclusion
- Food & Nutrition
- Governance & Rule of Law
- Personnes concernées
- N.A.
- Année
- 2015
Paragraphe
Access to justice and the right to food: the way forward 2015, para. 6
- Paragraph text
- The interdependence and indivisibility of economic, social and cultural rights and civil and political rights have long been asserted within international law, yet in practice economic, social and cultural rights have typically been relegated to second place within the international framework, with civil and political rights taking centre stage, particularly when it comes to implementation. While the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights includes an explicit provision requiring States "to develop the possibilities of judicial remedy" (art. 2, para. 3 (b)), no such specific provision is explicitly mentioned in the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. It should be noted, however, that the Committee has clarified that the obligation under article 2, paragraph 1, of the Covenant to "take steps … by all appropriate means" includes the provision of judicial remedies.
- Organe
- Special Rapporteur on the right to food
- Type de document
- Special Procedures' report
- Thèmes
- Equality & Inclusion
- Food & Nutrition
- Governance & Rule of Law
- Social & Cultural Rights
- Personnes concernées
- All
- Année
- 2015
Paragraphe
Access to justice and the right to food: the way forward 2015, para. 7
- Paragraph text
- The reluctance of a number of States to recognize that economic, social and cultural rights are justiciable has done much to propagate unfounded misconceptions thereon. Those countries opposed to the justiciability of those rights argue that such a notion may interfere with State sovereignty claiming that it is inappropriate for courts to adjudicate on social and economic policy. There is also a perception that social and economic rights set forth political objectives and are too vague to be enforceable. The suggestion that these rights are resource-dependent and cannot be satisfied where there is a lack of capital, and the idea that these rights only impose positive obligations on States and civil and political rights give rise to negative ones, has also led to resistance from some States.
- Organe
- Special Rapporteur on the right to food
- Type de document
- Special Procedures' report
- Thèmes
- Equality & Inclusion
- Food & Nutrition
- Governance & Rule of Law
- Année
- 2015
Paragraphe
Access to justice and the right to food: the way forward 2015, para. 8
- Paragraph text
- The justiciability debate continues to provoke controversy at the international level. However despite strong opposition from a number of States an Optional Protocol to the Covenant, establishing an individual complaints procedure, was finally adopted in 2008. Its subsequent entry into force in May 2013 was hailed as "potentially one of the most important developments in human rights protection at the UN level in a generation".
- Organe
- Special Rapporteur on the right to food
- Type de document
- Special Procedures' report
- Thèmes
- Food & Nutrition
- Governance & Rule of Law
- Personnes concernées
- N.A.
- Année
- 2015
Paragraphe
Access to justice and the right to food: the way forward 2015, para. 9
- Paragraph text
- The Optional Protocol is intended to complement rather than replace national legal systems and should not be considered as the principal means of seeking justice. The Optional Protocol grants individuals, or groups of individuals under the jurisdiction of a State party, the right to submit communications about alleged violations of any economic, social or cultural right to the Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (art. 2).
- Organe
- Special Rapporteur on the right to food
- Type de document
- Special Procedures' report
- Thèmes
- Equality & Inclusion
- Food & Nutrition
- Governance & Rule of Law
- Health
- Personnes concernées
- All
- Année
- 2015
Paragraphe
Access to justice and the right to food: the way forward 2015, para. 10
- Paragraph text
- Article 2 of the Optional Protocol requires that authors of communications must be under the jurisdiction of the State party responsible for the violation, and that the State must have ratified both the Covenant and the Optional Protocol. However, the Covenant indicates no restriction to territorial jurisdiction and it will remain to be seen whether the cases to be examined under the Optional Protocol concentrate principally on the territorial link.
- Organe
- Special Rapporteur on the right to food
- Type de document
- Special Procedures' report
- Thèmes
- Food & Nutrition
- Governance & Rule of Law
- Personnes concernées
- N.A.
- Année
- 2015
Paragraphe
Access to justice and the right to food: the way forward 2015, para. 11
- Paragraph text
- Victims of violations now have a means of making effective appeals through an international mechanism, once they have exhausted the grievance mechanisms within their own countries, or if there is an excessive delay in processing their claims through national procedures. The Optional Protocol also provides for interim measures for victims in exceptional circumstances in order to prevent irreparable damage to victims (art. 5).
- Organe
- Special Rapporteur on the right to food
- Type de document
- Special Procedures' report
- Thèmes
- Food & Nutrition
- Governance & Rule of Law
- Personnes concernées
- All
- Année
- 2015
Paragraphe
Access to justice and the right to food: the way forward 2015, para. 12
- Paragraph text
- The Optional Protocol also permits States to declare that they recognize the competence of the Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights to review inter-State communications in cases where one State party considers that another State party has failed to fulfil its obligations under the Covenant. The Committee may also have recourse to an inquiry procedure whereby it would consider allegations from reliable sources indicating grave or systematic violations by a State party of any of the rights set forth in the Covenant. While the Covenant does not have a mechanism to enforce decisions, findings and decisions by the Committee can increase awareness and scrutiny of specific violations at the international level. An international peer review mechanism such as the universal periodic review could be employed as a means of highlighting the failure of States to implement decisions under the Covenant.
- Organe
- Special Rapporteur on the right to food
- Type de document
- Special Procedures' report
- Thèmes
- Equality & Inclusion
- Food & Nutrition
- Governance & Rule of Law
- Personnes concernées
- All
- Année
- 2015
Paragraphe
Access to justice and the right to food: the way forward 2015, para. 13
- Paragraph text
- As outlined above, the right to food was once considered a controversial "positive" right, however recent years have witnessed a paradigm shift in terms of the global discourse on the right to food, with progress in jurisprudence and academic deliberations affirming that the right to food is justiciable. With the ratification of the Covenant, the right to food will have greater publicity, especially when NGOs and individuals start to use various remedies. The right to food is now a right than can be legitimately claimed. Complaint procedures remind governments of their responsibility to respect, protect and fulfil the right to adequate food. The Optional Protocol will be influential in ensuring the implementation of the right to food at the international and national level.
- Organe
- Special Rapporteur on the right to food
- Type de document
- Special Procedures' report
- Thèmes
- Equality & Inclusion
- Food & Nutrition
- Governance & Rule of Law
- Personnes concernées
- All
- Année
- 2015
Paragraphe
Access to justice and the right to food: the way forward 2015, para. 14
- Paragraph text
- The Right to Food Guidelines have done much to raise awareness and increase recognition of the right to adequate food and nutrition as a human right. They have also been instrumental in promoting the importance of recognizing the right to food in national legal frameworks. Guideline 7, in particular, invites States to initiate constitutional or legislative review to facilitate the progressive realization of the right to adequate food in the context of national food security. States are also advised to envisage "administrative, quasi-judicial and judicial mechanisms to provide adequate, effective and prompt remedies accessible, in particular, to members of vulnerable groups".
- Organe
- Special Rapporteur on the right to food
- Type de document
- Special Procedures' report
- Thèmes
- Equality & Inclusion
- Food & Nutrition
- Governance & Rule of Law
- Personnes concernées
- All
- Année
- 2015
Paragraphe
Access to justice and the right to food: the way forward 2015, para. 15
- Paragraph text
- Constitutional provisions and framework laws can be effective means of promoting the progressive realization of the right to food at the domestic level. The adoption of sectoral legislation will ensure that States adequately address various sectors that impact significantly on various dimensions of food security.
- Organe
- Special Rapporteur on the right to food
- Type de document
- Special Procedures' report
- Thèmes
- Equality & Inclusion
- Food & Nutrition
- Governance & Rule of Law
- Health
- Personnes concernées
- All
- Année
- 2015
Paragraphe
Access to justice and the right to food: the way forward 2015, para. 16
- Paragraph text
- Over the last few years, there has been an important increase in the number of States that have adopted provisions containing explicit recognition of the right to food or freedom from hunger. The following section will provide an overview of some recent examples of case law in relation to the justiciability of the right to food at the domestic and regional level.
- Organe
- Special Rapporteur on the right to food
- Type de document
- Special Procedures' report
- Thèmes
- Food & Nutrition
- Governance & Rule of Law
- Personnes concernées
- N.A.
- Année
- 2015
Paragraphe
Access to justice and the right to food: the way forward 2015, para. 17
- Paragraph text
- Latin America has shown itself to be the region of the world that has made the most progress in terms of developing legal frameworks that promote the right to food. With more than eight countries possessing specific laws aimed at promoting and protecting the right to food and a number of bills pending in National Assemblies for consideration, the right to adequate food is also referred to or explicitly recognized in several constitutions, including those of Brazil, Colombia, Cuba, Ecuador, Guatemala, Haiti, Nicaragua and Paraguay. In some cases, the constitutional provisions refer directly to the right to food, and its applicability to the whole population. In other cases, the right is directed at specific groups, while State signatories of the Covenant provide that it be applied directly through the constitution. The following cases are examples of where the right to food has been used as a legal argument to protect social rights.
- Organe
- Special Rapporteur on the right to food
- Type de document
- Special Procedures' report
- Thèmes
- Equality & Inclusion
- Food & Nutrition
- Governance & Rule of Law
- Personnes concernées
- N.A.
- Année
- 2015
Paragraphe
Access to justice and the right to food: the way forward 2015, para. 18
- Paragraph text
- In a 2013 decision, the Constitutional Chamber of the Supreme Court of El Salvador admitted a habeas corpus writ petition against the penitentiary administration in relation to a claimant in detention suffering from diabetes and hypertension. The applicant argued that the failure to provide him with adequate food and an appropriate diet violated his right to health and physical integrity. While the detainee's petition was rejected on the grounds that medical evidence did not support the claim, the case demonstrates the willingness of the court to consider the protection of economic, Social and cultural rights under habeas corpus procedures. The judgment handed down in this case is significant on two counts: firstly, it demonstrates that all human rights are interconnected and indivisible; and, secondly, even though medical evidence was insufficient, the court makes the connection between those suffering from diabetes and their need for adequate and healthy food, which creates an important precedent for future cases.
- Organe
- Special Rapporteur on the right to food
- Type de document
- Special Procedures' report
- Thèmes
- Governance & Rule of Law
- Health
- Année
- 2015
Paragraphe
Access to justice and the right to food: the way forward 2015, para. 19
- Paragraph text
- Judicial protection of land as a source of livelihood can be seen in judgments by the Constitutional Court of Colombia. One such significant case involves the community of Las Pavas, whose members occupied unused land in 1997 and began farming activities to feed themselves. Over the years, the community had been repeatedly subjected to various forms of intimidation and harassment, including attacks by paramilitary groups and the destruction of crops and food. A formal eviction order was issued in 2009 at the request of two private companies, who claimed ownership of the land. In 2011, the Colombian Constitutional Court delivered its judgment, finding that the actions leading to the eviction of the families of Las Pavas were unlawful and violated the right to a dignified existence, among other rights.
- Organe
- Special Rapporteur on the right to food
- Type de document
- Special Procedures' report
- Thèmes
- Environment
- Social & Cultural Rights
- Personnes concernées
- Families
- Année
- 2015
Paragraphe
Access to justice and the right to food: the way forward 2015, para. 20
- Paragraph text
- In 2013, a coalition of NGOs Guatemala sin Hambre engaged in strategic litigation to claim the right to food of children suffering from chronic malnutrition and living in conditions of extreme poverty. The judgements were delivered in April 2013 by the Child and Adolescence Court of the Zacapa Department which, based on the facts, found violations of the right to food, the right to life, the right to housing and the right to an adequate standard of living. Specifically with regard to the right to food, the court grounded its reasoning on article 51 of the Constitution, which protects the right to food for children, as well as on article 11 of the Covenant and article 25 of the Universal Declaration. To define the right to food and the obligations that stem from it, the court cited general comment No. 12.
- Organe
- Special Rapporteur on the right to food
- Type de document
- Special Procedures' report
- Thèmes
- Equality & Inclusion
- Food & Nutrition
- Governance & Rule of Law
- Poverty
- Personnes concernées
- Children
- Année
- 2015
Paragraphe
Access to justice and the right to food: the way forward 2015, para. 21
- Paragraph text
- The constitutional jurisprudence of India provides for the justiciability of economic, social and cultural rights based on "the right to life". This constitutional right was central to the case of People's Union for Civil Liberties ("PUCL") v. Union of India. In mid-2001, public food and employment programmes failed to provide food to deprived people in the impoverished and drought-stricken State of Rajasthan. The Supreme Court of India was petitioned by PUCL to compel the Government to respond to the hunger emergency. In response to the submissions, the Supreme Court held that the right to food was enshrined in the Constitution under the right to life provision in article 47, which requires that the State undertake measures to improve the nutritional state of the population. The Court handed down a series of resolutions which commenced in 2001 requiring State governments in India to implement food distribution programmes for the most disadvantaged. The Court's resolution had a considerable impact on the realization of the right to food in India, and provides an example of the influential role played by the judiciary in encouraging a legislative body to develop human rights legislation.
- Organe
- Special Rapporteur on the right to food
- Type de document
- Special Procedures' report
- Thèmes
- Food & Nutrition
- Governance & Rule of Law
- Humanitarian
- Poverty
- Personnes concernées
- All
- Année
- 2015
Paragraphe
Access to justice and the right to food: the way forward 2015, para. 22
- Paragraph text
- India has led the way, not only at the regional level, but also globally, in terms of developing jurisprudence on economic, social and cultural rights. Its Constitution provides a strong legal framework for the protection and promotion of human rights, with article 47 noting that "States shall regard the raising of the level of nutrition and the standard of living of its people and the improvement of public health as among its primary duties". It has also recently joined a select group of countries that are legally obliged to ensure the distribution of subsidized food grains to its people. With the historic passing of its National Food Security Act in September 2013, India has pledged to provide heavily subsidized food grains to approximately two thirds of its population. The National Food Security Act will amount to the largest food security programme in the world, and aims to reduce malnutrition and improve food security. It also promotes gender-based rights and social inclusion of women, and includes provision for social monitoring and complaint mechanisms. While the Act has received criticism, particularly owing to its failure to address the nutritional aspect, and for placing too much emphasis on public distribution without tackling the root causes of poverty and hunger, the Special Rapporteur commends Indian efforts to address chronic malnutrition, and encourages India to work with relevant stakeholders to tackle any potential gaps that may prevent this innovative approach from achieving its full potential
- Organe
- Special Rapporteur on the right to food
- Type de document
- Special Procedures' report
- Thèmes
- Equality & Inclusion
- Food & Nutrition
- Gender
- Governance & Rule of Law
- Health
- Personnes concernées
- Women
- Année
- 2015
Paragraphe
Access to justice and the right to food: the way forward 2015, para. 23
- Paragraph text
- The following examples illustrate the positive role played by regional human rights mechanisms. In the case Centre for Minority Rights Development (Kenya) and Minority Rights Group International on behalf of Endorois Welfare Council v. Kenya, the Endorois, a primarily pastoralist indigenous community, were removed from their lands by the Government of Kenya to establish a wildlife reserve. The African Commission found Kenya to have violated articles 8, 14, 17, 21 and 22 of the African Charter. The Commission noted that, as a consequence of its removal, the community had been "relegated to semi-arid land", which was unsuitable for pastoralism. The ability to graze animals, a key means of subsistence for the community, had become impossible as a result of loss of their land and this threatened the community's survival.
- Organe
- Special Rapporteur on the right to food
- Type de document
- Special Procedures' report
- Thèmes
- Environment
- Food & Nutrition
- Social & Cultural Rights
- Personnes concernées
- Ethnic minorities
- Année
- 2015
Paragraphe
Access to justice and the right to food: the way forward 2015, para. 24
- Paragraph text
- In its case SERAC v. Nigeria, the African Commission held that the treatment by Nigeria of the Ogoni indigenous community violated the right to food implied in the African Charter. In their statement to the African Commission, the NGOs submitting the claim contended that: "the Nigerian government ... destroyed and threatened Ogoni food sources through a variety of means. The government ... participated in irresponsible oil development that poisoned much of the soil and water upon which Ogoni farming and fishing depended. In their raids on villages, Nigerian security forces have destroyed crops and killed farm animals. The security forces have created a state of terror and insecurity that ... made it impossible for many Ogoni villagers to return to their fields and animals. The destruction of farm lands, rivers, crops and animals created malnutrition and starvation among certain Ogoni communities."
- Organe
- Special Rapporteur on the right to food
- Type de document
- Special Procedures' report
- Thèmes
- Environment
- Food & Nutrition
- Personnes concernées
- Ethnic minorities
- Année
- 2015
Paragraphe
Access to justice and the right to food: the way forward 2015, para. 25
- Paragraph text
- While on the whole European countries have been more reluctant to accept the justiciability of economic, social and cultural rights, there have been some significant cases. For example, in the 2012 German Federal Constitutional Court judgment 1 BvL 10/10, the court ruled on whether cash benefits for asylum seekers provided by the Asylum Seekers Benefit Act were compatible with its Constitution. The court relied on earlier decisions to reiterate that the State is under an obligation to ensure a "dignified minimum existence", defined as a "comprehensive fundamental rights guarantee" which includes access to food, clothing, household items, housing, heating, hygiene health and social assistance to persons in need. The benefits awarded to the asylum seekers under the law in question were deemed insufficient to guarantee a dignified minimum existence. The court also reaffirmed that benefits must be calculated on the basis of "real and actual needs" and thus be measured realistically. The court noted that the benefits prescribed under the Asylum Seekers Benefit Act had not increased since 1993, even though the cost of living in Germany had risen by 30 per cent in that period. As a result, a number of provisions of the act were declared unconstitutional. The court ordered the enactment of new legislation that would ensure a dignified minimum standard of living and introduced a transitional scheme that would provide higher cash benefits in the interim.
- Organe
- Special Rapporteur on the right to food
- Type de document
- Special Procedures' report
- Thèmes
- Equality & Inclusion
- Governance & Rule of Law
- Health
- Movement
- Social & Cultural Rights
- Personnes concernées
- Persons on the move
- Année
- 2015
Paragraphe
Access to justice and the right to food: the way forward 2015, para. 26
- Paragraph text
- While there has been considerable legislative and judicial progress in many countries throughout the world since the adoption of the Right to Food Guidelines (see A/68/288), examples of cases whereby national courts have actually issued rulings on the regulations relating to the right to food are scarce. The only way that the full realization of the right to adequate food and nutrition can be achieved is by ensuring that the rights of victims are protected. Restrictions on justiciability must therefore be prevented. This section will seek to highlight some of the obstacles that continue to hamper progress in this regard.
- Organe
- Special Rapporteur on the right to food
- Type de document
- Special Procedures' report
- Thèmes
- Food & Nutrition
- Governance & Rule of Law
- Personnes concernées
- All
- Année
- 2015
Paragraphe
Access to justice and the right to food: the way forward 2015, para. 27
- Paragraph text
- A rights-based approach to food security is paramount to ensure that the fundamental right to be free from hunger is upheld, with States obliged to do everything in their power to guarantee that everyone has access at all times to adequate, safe and nutrient-rich food in order to lead healthy lives. Yet, despite the fact that the right to food has been enshrined in international law, many States remain reluctant to recognize it and to constitutionalize it as a basic right with justiciable effect.
- Organe
- Special Rapporteur on the right to food
- Type de document
- Special Procedures' report
- Thèmes
- Equality & Inclusion
- Food & Nutrition
- Governance & Rule of Law
- Health
- Personnes concernées
- All
- Année
- 2015
Paragraphe
Access to justice and the right to food: the way forward 2015, para. 28
- Paragraph text
- While the ratification of the Optional Protocol to the Covenant represented a significant step in terms of ensuring justice for the victims of violations of economic, social and cultural rights, to date only 15 States are currently party thereto, in comparison with 115 parties to the Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. This in itself is representative of the fact that many States have failed to develop a judicial culture of recognition in practice, or the necessary legal frameworks required to ensure that the rights enshrined in the Covenant, including the right to food, are justiciable. In some countries, it is the case that international human rights conventions are not considered as formal sources of law and, even where they may be incorporated into national law, these rights may not provide criminal punishment or financial compensations, but rather expresses a moral conviction without legal force. In some States, even when justiciable rights are enshrined in the Constitution, there is a reluctance to acknowledge their relevance. There is also certain reluctance at the regional level, with many European States failing to recognize the direct applicability of the Covenant in domestic law. In Africa, the African Commission on Human and Peoples' Rights provides no option for complaints relating to the violation of the right to food.
- Organe
- Special Rapporteur on the right to food
- Type de document
- Special Procedures' report
- Thèmes
- Food & Nutrition
- Governance & Rule of Law
- Social & Cultural Rights
- Personnes concernées
- All
- Année
- 2015
Paragraphe
Access to justice and the right to food: the way forward 2015, para. 29
- Paragraph text
- Accountability at international, regional and national levels is paramount to ensuring that the right to food and its correlative obligations are being implemented. At the domestic level, it is imperative that constitutional principles and framework laws are established as a means of providing an appropriate institutional structure to ensure the progressive realization of the right to food. In some cases, however, even where States have taken the necessary steps to develop framework laws and policies in order to promote the right to food, a lack of political will has prevented implementation and enforcement of these laws.
- Organe
- Special Rapporteur on the right to food
- Type de document
- Special Procedures' report
- Thèmes
- Food & Nutrition
- Governance & Rule of Law
- Personnes concernées
- All
- N.A.
- Année
- 2015
Paragraphe
Access to justice and the right to food: the way forward 2015, para. 30
- Paragraph text
- A lack of awareness of legal rights and entitlements, as well as the State's obligations and duties to protect these rights, is a major barrier to achieving the enjoyment of the full range of rights, including economic, social and cultural rights. General knowledge and understanding of judicial and adjudicatory mechanisms as a means of enforcing basic rights is severely lacking in many countries.
- Organe
- Special Rapporteur on the right to food
- Type de document
- Special Procedures' report
- Thèmes
- Equality & Inclusion
- Governance & Rule of Law
- Health
- Personnes concernées
- All
- Année
- 2015
Paragraphe