E/2004/27 E/CN.6/2004/14 Hungary,1 Iceland,1 Ireland,1 Italy,1 Japan, Latvia,1 Lithuania,1 Luxembourg,1 Malta,1 Netherlands, Poland,1 Portugal,1 Serbia and Montenegro,1 Slovakia,1 Slovenia,1 Spain,1 Sweden,1 the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia,1 Turkey, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and Uzbekistan.1 45. At the same meeting, Argentina, Croatia, Liechtenstein, Norway, the Philippines, the Republic of Korea, Romania and Thailand joined in sponsoring the revised draft resolution. 46. Also at the same meeting, the Commission was advised that the revised draft resolution contained no programme implications. 47. Also at the 14th meeting, the Commission approved the draft resolution and recommended it to the Economic and Social Council for adoption (see chap. I, sect. A, draft resolution I). 48. After the adoption of the draft resolution, a statement was made by the representative of the United States of America. Situation of and assistance to Palestinian women 49. At the 12th meeting, on 9 March, the observer for Qatar, on behalf of the States Members of the United Nations that are members of the Group of 77 and China, introduced a draft resolution entitled “Situation of and assistance to Palestinian women” (E/CN.6/2004/L.2) and orally revised it in the seventh preambular paragraph, by replacing the words “concerned also that the construction of a wall by Israel” with the words “concerned also that the route marked out for the wall under construction by Israel”. 50. At the 14th meeting, on 11 March, the observer for Qatar orally revised operative paragraph 7 as follows: (a) The words “including those laid out in the report of the SecretaryGeneral” were revised to read “including those laid out in his report”; (b) The words “a report based on information provided by the Economic and Social Commission for Western Asia” was revised to read “a report including information provided by the Economic and Social Commission for Western Asia”. 51. At the same meeting, the Commission was advised that the revised draft resolution contained no programme implications. 52. At the same meeting, the Commission approved the draft resolution, as orally revised, by a recorded vote of 39 to 1, with 1 abstention and recommended it to the Economic and Social Council for adoption (see chap. I, sect. A, draft resolution II). The voting was as follows: In favour: Algeria, Argentina, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belgium, Benin, Bolivia, Botswana, Brazil, Burkina Faso, Chile, China, Congo, Croatia, Cuba, Denmark, Germany, Guinea, India, Indonesia, Iran (Islamic Republic of), Japan, Kyrgyzstan, Malawi, Malaysia, Netherlands, Nigeria, Pakistan, Peru, Republic of Korea, Russian Federation, South Africa, Sudan, Thailand, Tunisia, Turkey, United Arab Emirates, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, United Republic of Tanzania. 40