E/2009/27 E/CN.6/2009/15 (c) In operative paragraph 14, “HIV/AIDS” was replaced by the words “HIV and AIDS”; (d) In operative paragraph 23, the words “the spread of HIV�� were replaced by the words “the spread of HIV/AIDS”. 79. Subsequently, Algeria, Austria, Belgium, Belize, Benin, Brazil, Bulgaria, Cameroon, Canada, Cape Verde, Chile, Côte d’Ivoire, Croatia, Cuba, Cyprus, the Czech Republic, the Democratic Republic of the Congo, the Dominican Republic, Ecuador, Eritrea, Estonia, Finland, France, Gabon, Germany, Ghana, Greece, Guatemala, Guinea, Haiti, Honduras, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Japan, Kazakhstan, Liechtenstein, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Mexico, the Netherlands, Nicaragua, the Niger, Nigeria, Panama, Papua New Guinea, Portugal, the Republic of Korea, Romania, Senegal, Seychelles, Sierra Leone, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Thailand, Togo, Turkey, Uganda, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, the United States of America and Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of) joined in sponsoring the draft resolution, as orally revised. 4 80. At same meeting, the Commission was informed that the draft resolution had no programme budget implications. 81. Also at the 16th meeting, the Commission adopted the draft resolution, as orally revised (see chap. I, sect. E, resolution 53/2). 82. After the adoption of the draft resolution, statements were made by the representative of Sweden, on behalf of the European Union, and the observer for Chile. Future organization and methods of work of the Commission on the Status of Women 83. At the 16th meeting, on 13 March, the Vice-Chairperson of the Commission, Julio Peralta (Paraguay), introduced a draft resolution entitled “Future organization and methods of work of the Commission on the Status of Women” (E/CN.6/2009/L.6), submitted by him on the basis of informal consultations, and orally revised the text by deleting, under section A, operative paragraph 2, which read: “Also decides that the Commission should make best use of its time to promote opportunities for enhanced interactive dialogue with all participants, including among the Member States, in order to strengthen the policy coordination and share best practices”, and renumbering the remaining paragraphs accordingly. 84. At the same meeting, the Commission was informed that the draft resolution had no programme budget implications. 85. Also at its 16th meeting, the Commission adopted the draft resolution, as orally revised (see chap. I, sect. C, draft resolution III). __________________ 4 09-28398 Following the adoption of draft resolution E/CN.6/2009/L.6, as orally revised, the delegation of Denmark indicated that it had intended to join in sponsoring the draft resolution. 39