A/67/278 employer for unfair and unjust working conditions or when a woman without personal income or resources brings a case against her partner for domestic violence. Procedural inequality can also arise in litigation against the State. 14. The existence of significant socioeconomic inequality between the parties in a proceeding requires States to adopt all necessary measures to help to reduce or eliminate the deficiencies that impair or diminish the effective protection of the rights at stake. If such measures are not taken, those who are socially or economically disadvantaged do not enjoy a real opportunity for justice or the benefits of due process of law in an equal manner. These obligations arise in civil and criminal cases and in pretrial stages of the justice chain, when the rights of persons living in poverty are also at stake. 15. Even in the most developed countries, legal disempowerment is rife and persons living in poverty do not have full de jure or de facto access to justice. Around the world, persons living in poverty face a range of obstacles in claiming and enforcing, or contesting violations of, their rights. Such obstacles not only imply violations of their rights to a remedy and due process, but also undermine their ability to enjoy other human rights equally and without discrimination. States, therefore, are under an obligation to eliminate obstacles which frustrate the efforts of the poorest and most vulnerable to access justice. Effective enforcement of and compliance with judicial rulings in favour of persons living in poverty are also essential to ensure that persons living in poverty can benefit from the law. 16. The Special Rapporteur chose to focus the present report on obstacles to access to justice, because overcoming such obstacles is fundamental to improving the situation of the poorest and most vulnerable, and empowering them to claim their rights. The report is based on the understanding that meaningful access to justice for persons living in poverty does not depend only on legal tools or access to legal services, lawyers and courts, but also requires a more comprehensive and holistic approach that takes into account broader structural, social and economic factors. III. Obstacles which impede persons living in poverty from accessing justice 17. Some of the obstacles that persons living in poverty face, such as the cost of legal advice, administrative fees and other collateral costs, relate directly to their lack of financial resources. Other obstacles, including lack of access to information and lack of legal recognition arise out of discrimination against the poorest and most marginalized. Furthermore, institutional and structural obstacles are found in the design and operation of justice systems; these include the inadequate capacity and resources of courts, the police and prosecution corps, the corrupt practices therein, and the location of courts and police stations. Poor functioning of the justice system particularly affects the poor, because pursuing justice requires a much greater effort and investment in terms of money and time for them, while their chances of a just and favourable outcome are worse. The deprivations that persons living in poverty encounter throughout their lives — lack of access to quality education, reduced access to information, limited political voice and social capital — translate into lower levels of legal literacy and awareness of their rights, creating social obstacles to seeking redress. 6 12-45806