Search Tips
sorted by
30 shown of 102 entities
Human Rights Obligations Related to Non-State Service Provision in Water and Sanitation 2010, para. 13
- Paragraph text
- To a large extent, the debate has focused on the relative advantages and disadvantages of formal public or private provision, too often losing sight of this de facto commercialized service provision. While such services differ greatly depending on the circumstances, it is not uncommon for people to have no choice but to rely on services (often low quality) which are exorbitantly priced. Due to the high number of intermediaries involved in providing the service, high transport costs and a lack of regulation, water bought from informal private vendors is frequently 10 to 20 times as expensive as water provided by a utility. When looking beyond networked water supply and sewerage, adding in informal small-scale providers, a completely different picture of the characteristics of the private sector emerges. Overall, there is a need for a more nuanced debate, which recognizes the various forms of private sector participation, the wide range of non-State actors involved, the role of State-owned companies, as well as differences between networked provision of water and sanitation vs. on-site solutions.
- Body
- Special Rapporteur on the human rights to safe drinking water and sanitation
- Document type
- Special Procedures' report
- Means of adoption
- N.A.
- Topic(s)
- Economic Rights
- Governance & Rule of Law
- Water & Sanitation
- Person(s) affected
- N.A.
- Year
- 2010
Paragraph
Human Rights Obligations Related to Non-State Service Provision in Water and Sanitation 2010, para. 63l
- Paragraph text
- [The human rights framework does not call for any particular form of service provision. It is well established that, from a human rights perspective, States can opt to involve non-State actors in sanitation and water services provision. But the State cannot exempt itself from its human rights obligations and hence remains the primary duty-bearer. Therefore, also when involving other actors in services provision, the role of the State is crucial. The obligations of States and the responsibilities of non-State actors are complementary. The latter can and should support the State in the realization of human rights. In line with these conclusions, the independent expert offers the following recommendations:] States must put into place supplementary social policies to ensure inclusiveness, such as safety nets and subsidies. These measures must be well targeted to actually reach those who need it most;
- Body
- Special Rapporteur on the human rights to safe drinking water and sanitation
- Document type
- Special Procedures' report
- Means of adoption
- N.A.
- Topic(s)
- Economic Rights
- Governance & Rule of Law
- Water & Sanitation
- Person(s) affected
- N.A.
- Year
- 2010
Paragraph
Financing for the Realization of the Rights to Water and Sanitation 2011, para. 70
- Paragraph text
- A lack of transparency may also impede accurate measurement of resources when States enter into contracts for service delivery with the private sector, particularly as bidding processes and contracts tend not to be made public. The Special Rapporteur has emphasized the importance of transparency in private sector participation, particularly noting that the final contract and terms of reference must be available for public scrutiny and comment (A/HRC/15/31, para. 36). Private contractors have also sometimes intentionally underbid, artificially lowering costs in order to win contracts and then securing more favourable terms in bilateral renegotiations of contracts, a practice which the Special Rapporteur has highlighted as contrary to human rights requirements.
- Body
- Special Rapporteur on the human rights to safe drinking water and sanitation
- Document type
- Special Procedures' report
- Means of adoption
- N.A.
- Topic(s)
- Economic Rights
- Governance & Rule of Law
- Person(s) affected
- N.A.
- Year
- 2011
Paragraph
Sustainability and non-retrogression in the realisation of the rights to water and sanitation 2013, para. 59
- Paragraph text
- From a human rights perspective it is crucial to balance economic and social sustainability. The human rights framework does not require that water and sanitation services be provided free of charge, and State revenues have to be raised in order to ensure universal access to services. If everyone obtained water and sanitation at no cost this would actually harm low-income households by depriving governments and service providers of the revenue needed to expand and maintain the service, jeopardizing the overall economic sustainability of the system and the State's capacity to protect and fulfil other human rights. However, implementing the human rights to water and sanitation has important implications as to how to raise revenues while ensuring social sustainability. They oblige States to ensure that the cost of accessing water and sanitation remains affordable and appropriately reflects the needs of marginalized and vulnerable groups, and that there is a safety net in place for those who cannot afford to pay full costs.
- Body
- Special Rapporteur on the human rights to safe drinking water and sanitation
- Document type
- Special Procedures' report
- Means of adoption
- N.A.
- Topic(s)
- Economic Rights
- Equality & Inclusion
- Social & Cultural Rights
- Water & Sanitation
- Person(s) affected
- All
- N.A.
- Year
- 2013
Paragraph
Sustainability and non-retrogression in the realisation of the rights to water and sanitation 2013, para. 53
- Paragraph text
- Monitoring and data collection are essential in giving States a basis for planning and budgeting, and ensuring informed decisions. In a large number of States, information systems for financial planning and reporting are still inadequate. Monitoring the sustainability of interventions is generally insufficient, including in the framework of the Millennium Development Goals. This creates a major gap in the ability of States to understand what policies, infrastructure and service delivery practices are able to last and be effective in the long term, as well as the negative consequences of certain (in)action.
- Body
- Special Rapporteur on the human rights to safe drinking water and sanitation
- Document type
- Special Procedures' report
- Means of adoption
- N.A.
- Topic(s)
- Economic Rights
- Governance & Rule of Law
- Person(s) affected
- N.A.
- Year
- 2013
Paragraph
Service regulation and human rights to water and sanitation 2017, para. 32
- Paragraph text
- Regulatory frameworks may also be characterized by a broad spectrum of contractual arrangements between governments which formally delegate service provision, and third parties. In such cases, the instrument delegating service provision defines the relationship between the public asset owner and the service provider and sets service standards. In the case of State-owned companies, management will usually be delegated via legislation, decrees or contracts, while public authorities will often enter into contracts with private providers. Contracts may differ according to the ownership of assets, the responsibility for capital investments, the allocation of risks, the responsibility for operations and maintenance, and the typical contract duration. France is a country with a long history of this type of regulation, established through private-sector participation contracting with local government.
- Body
- Special Rapporteur on the human rights to safe drinking water and sanitation
- Document type
- Special Procedures' report
- Means of adoption
- N.A.
- Topic(s)
- Economic Rights
- Governance & Rule of Law
- Person(s) affected
- N.A.
- Year
- 2017
Paragraph
Service regulation and human rights to water and sanitation 2017, para. 69
- Paragraph text
- The situation becomes far more complex when monitoring informal small-scale providers. Piped systems are often not available to rural households or to those living in informal settlements in urban areas (see A/70/203, para. 64). This represents a significant problem of inequality in access, as people living in these areas, who are often poorer, have to rely on alternatives that are often of lower quality and that tend to cost far more. In these situations, some types of services, such as informal shared or communal facilities and unregulated individual on-site solutions, are seen as necessary short- to medium-term solutions. However, without suitable regulation and monitoring, none of these services can be guaranteed to comply with human rights standards.
- Body
- Special Rapporteur on the human rights to safe drinking water and sanitation
- Document type
- Special Procedures' report
- Means of adoption
- N.A.
- Topic(s)
- Economic Rights
- Equality & Inclusion
- Person(s) affected
- N.A.
- Year
- 2017
Paragraph
Human Rights Obligations Related to Non-State Service Provision in Water and Sanitation 2010, para. 29
- Paragraph text
- From a human rights perspective, it is imperative to determine whether service delivery contributes to or undermines the realization of human rights. Therefore, the provision of services must be assessed against the standard of the human rights to sanitation and water. While all aspects of these rights, that is, availability, safety, acceptability, accessibility, affordability, participation, non-discrimination and accountability, have to be met, some will become more relevant than others in the following discussion.
- Body
- Special Rapporteur on the human rights to safe drinking water and sanitation
- Document type
- Special Procedures' report
- Means of adoption
- N.A.
- Topic(s)
- Economic Rights
- Equality & Inclusion
- Water & Sanitation
- Person(s) affected
- All
- N.A.
- Year
- 2010
Paragraph
Service regulation and human rights to water and sanitation 2017, para. 33
- Paragraph text
- A number of human rights challenges arise when regulating service provision by contract, particularly when non-State actors are involved. Such challenges include guaranteeing transparent and democratic decision-making, addressing power asymmetries in the bidding and negotiation process, ensuring affordable services, avoiding disconnections in cases of inability to pay, ensuring monitoring and accountability, and addressing corruption. It is also important that contracts, which are normally valid for decades, can be reviewed and adapted over time.
- Body
- Special Rapporteur on the human rights to safe drinking water and sanitation
- Document type
- Special Procedures' report
- Means of adoption
- N.A.
- Topic(s)
- Economic Rights
- Governance & Rule of Law
- Person(s) affected
- N.A.
- Year
- 2017
Paragraph
Common violations of the human rights to water and sanitation 2014, para. 48
- Paragraph text
- A particular concern relates to private sector participation and withdrawal of State regulation, oversight and provision in times of austerity. The Portuguese auditing institution found that private-public partnerships - by not sharing risks and benefits equally - benefit largely the private sector, that they are detrimental to the people and that services are often of lower quality while higher prices are charged. The Special Rapporteur has raised related concerns in a series of communications.
- Body
- Special Rapporteur on the human rights to safe drinking water and sanitation
- Document type
- Special Procedures' report
- Means of adoption
- N.A.
- Topic(s)
- Economic Rights
- Governance & Rule of Law
- Person(s) affected
- N.A.
- Year
- 2014
Paragraph
Different levels and types of services and the human rights to water and sanitation 2015, para. 78
- Paragraph text
- In principle, States are obliged to progressively realize economic, social and cultural rights, although there are some immediate obligations, such as non discrimination. The human rights framework acknowledges that the full realization of economic, social and cultural rights takes time in many States. However, States have to move towards the goal of full realization as expeditiously and efficiently as possible. Where they have the capacity to realize the human rights to water and sanitation in full, they have an obligation to do so. All States must undertake deliberate, targeted and concrete steps to that end. The concept of progressive realization does not leave the realization of human rights to the States' discretion. It is qualified by an obligation to devote the maximum of available resources towards the realization of human rights. While difficult to measure in concrete terms, the principle of using the maximum available resources sets an objective standard for compliance with human rights obligations.
- Body
- Special Rapporteur on the human rights to safe drinking water and sanitation
- Document type
- Special Procedures' report
- Means of adoption
- N.A.
- Topic(s)
- Economic Rights
- Equality & Inclusion
- Governance & Rule of Law
- Social & Cultural Rights
- Water & Sanitation
- Person(s) affected
- All
- N.A.
- Year
- 2015
Paragraph
Affordability of water and sanitation services 2015, para. 78
- Paragraph text
- Particular challenges arise for regulation in the context of small-scale and informal provision, as governments often do not have any control over the operation of these providers. Governments may formalize the informal sector while keeping the small-scale nature of the provision through effective regulation, such that the small-scale providers serve as contractors to the government. This is the strategy that is being initiated in Nairobi, Kenya, where water kiosks in informal settlements are supplied by and registered with the utility, and the tariff is fixed by the regulatory body. However, this tariff is not always complied with. Where households rely on informal service provision, governments should also provide support in terms of management and technical support to increase the quality and affordability of their services. A similar approach is taken in Maputo, Mozambique, where the regulator supports informal service provision in the absence of the capacity of the utility, in the short-to-medium term, to deliver services to all residents.
- Body
- Special Rapporteur on the human rights to safe drinking water and sanitation
- Document type
- Special Procedures' report
- Means of adoption
- N.A.
- Topic(s)
- Economic Rights
- Governance & Rule of Law
- Person(s) affected
- N.A.
- Year
- 2015
Paragraph
Affordability of water and sanitation services 2015, para. 86
- Paragraph text
- Affordability is key for the realization of the human rights to water and sanitation. Ensuring affordable service provision for all people requires a paradigm shift - starting from the perspective of human rights. Economic sustainability and affordability for all people are not impossible to reconcile, but human rights require rethinking current lines of argumentation and redesigning current instruments. The main challenge is to ensure that targeted measures and instruments do, in fact, reach the people who rely on them most. For instance, tariffs must be designed in such a way that the most disadvantaged of those connected to formal utilities receive the assistance they need. It also requires ensuring that public finance and subsidies reach the most marginalized and disadvantaged individuals and communities, who are often not (yet) connected to a formal network, who may live in informal settlements without any formal title or in remote rural areas where self-supply is common, and who are often overlooked or deliberately ignored in current policymaking and planning.
- Body
- Special Rapporteur on the human rights to safe drinking water and sanitation
- Document type
- Special Procedures' report
- Means of adoption
- N.A.
- Topic(s)
- Economic Rights
- Equality & Inclusion
- Water & Sanitation
- Person(s) affected
- N.A.
- Year
- 2015
Paragraph
Different levels and types of services and the human rights to water and sanitation 2015, para. 39
- Paragraph text
- Any of these systems may be owned and operated by public or private entities, and working for-profit or not-for-profit. These aspects of service management models will not be considered in the report (see A/HRC/15/31).
- Body
- Special Rapporteur on the human rights to safe drinking water and sanitation
- Document type
- Special Procedures' report
- Means of adoption
- N.A.
- Topic(s)
- Economic Rights
- Governance & Rule of Law
- Person(s) affected
- N.A.
- Year
- 2015
Paragraph
Service regulation and human rights to water and sanitation 2017, para. 53
- Paragraph text
- Inextricably linked to the question of setting affordability standards for water and sanitation services is the issue of disconnections. Regulatory frameworks should set an outright prohibition on disconnections due to inability to pay.
- Body
- Special Rapporteur on the human rights to safe drinking water and sanitation
- Document type
- Special Procedures' report
- Means of adoption
- N.A.
- Topic(s)
- Economic Rights
- Equality & Inclusion
- Water & Sanitation
- Person(s) affected
- N.A.
- Year
- 2017
Paragraph
Planning for the realization of the rights to water and sanitation 2011, para. 78
- Paragraph text
- The Zambian Devolution Trust Fund, for example, conducted a baseline study collecting data on water and sanitation disaggregated by, among other things, urban and rural area and income level. Based on these findings, Zambia specifically targets low-income areas through the promotion of low-cost technology, such as water kiosks with the tariffs set at the lowest band. Complementary to cross-subsidization through the tariff structure, the construction of infrastructure in urban low-income areas is financed through the Trust Fund.
- Body
- Special Rapporteur on the human rights to safe drinking water and sanitation
- Document type
- Special Procedures' report
- Means of adoption
- N.A.
- Topic(s)
- Economic Rights
- Governance & Rule of Law
- Water & Sanitation
- Person(s) affected
- N.A.
- Year
- 2011
Paragraph
Service regulation and human rights to water and sanitation 2017, para. 28
- Paragraph text
- The role of regulation and monitoring becomes particularly challenging in rural areas and in densely populated informal settlements in urban areas, where large proportions of the population are not served by a piped network and rely on informal small-scale providers, which often operate unregulated and as a result provide poor-quality services at high prices. Given the informal nature of the provision, and the lack of regulation and monitoring, users of such services do not have a complaint mechanism that they can avail themselves of when services are inadequate or unaffordable.
- Body
- Special Rapporteur on the human rights to safe drinking water and sanitation
- Document type
- Special Procedures' report
- Means of adoption
- N.A.
- Topic(s)
- Economic Rights
- Person(s) affected
- N.A.
- Year
- 2017
Paragraph
Common violations of the human rights to water and sanitation 2014, para. 32
- Paragraph text
- Independently of State obligations to protect vis-à-vis non-State actors, the latter also have human rights responsibilities and may be held accountable for failures. Under the United Nations Guiding Principles, businesses have a responsibility to respect human rights and to exercise due diligence to avoid any action which would result in human rights abuses in the scope of their operations, including their supply chain. If non-State actors abuse human rights, victims must be ensured access to justice.
- Body
- Special Rapporteur on the human rights to safe drinking water and sanitation
- Document type
- Special Procedures' report
- Means of adoption
- N.A.
- Topic(s)
- Economic Rights
- Governance & Rule of Law
- Person(s) affected
- All
- N.A.
- Year
- 2014
Paragraph
Affordability of water and sanitation services 2015, para. 77
- Paragraph text
- Once a tariff system that meets affordability standards has been developed, the body responsible for regulating service providers should be able to ensure both that the tariff system is correctly applied, and that it is having the desired impact on affordability levels for all users. Likewise, a regulatory body, in collaboration with the relevant government department, can ensure that public financing is adequately targeted. Complaints mechanisms, put into place by service providers or regulators, can support these processes.
- Body
- Special Rapporteur on the human rights to safe drinking water and sanitation
- Document type
- Special Procedures' report
- Means of adoption
- N.A.
- Topic(s)
- Economic Rights
- Governance & Rule of Law
- Person(s) affected
- N.A.
- Year
- 2015
Paragraph
The MDGs and the human rights to water and sanitation 2010, para. 18
- Paragraph text
- Both the Millennium Development Goals and human rights foresee international cooperation in order to assist resource-constrained countries. Goal 8 contains a number of commitments on further developing the trading and financial system, increasing market access, enhancing debt relief, increasing official development assistance, improving access to essential drugs and encouraging technology transfer, taking into account, in particular, the needs of least developed countries, landlocked developing countries and small island developing States. Few Millennium Development Goals have attracted as much sustained criticism as Goal 8, however. Unlike other Goals, it provides little if any basis for accountability, in that it lacks time-bound targets. The human rights framework can make a difference in this regard.
- Body
- Special Rapporteur on the human rights to safe drinking water and sanitation
- Document type
- Special Procedures' report
- Means of adoption
- N.A.
- Topic(s)
- Economic Rights
- Governance & Rule of Law
- Person(s) affected
- N.A.
- Year
- 2010
Paragraph
Human Rights Obligations Related to Non-State Service Provision in Water and Sanitation 2010, para. 63o
- Paragraph text
- [The human rights framework does not call for any particular form of service provision. It is well established that, from a human rights perspective, States can opt to involve non-State actors in sanitation and water services provision. But the State cannot exempt itself from its human rights obligations and hence remains the primary duty-bearer. Therefore, also when involving other actors in services provision, the role of the State is crucial. The obligations of States and the responsibilities of non-State actors are complementary. The latter can and should support the State in the realization of human rights. In line with these conclusions, the independent expert offers the following recommendations:] States should ensure that economic, social and cultural rights, including the rights to sanitation and water, are justiciable before national courts and other accountability mechanisms. They must ensure access to justice in practical terms, including physical and economic access on an equitable basis;
- Body
- Special Rapporteur on the human rights to safe drinking water and sanitation
- Document type
- Special Procedures' report
- Means of adoption
- N.A.
- Topic(s)
- Economic Rights
- Equality & Inclusion
- Governance & Rule of Law
- Water & Sanitation
- Person(s) affected
- All
- N.A.
- Year
- 2010
Paragraph
Sustainability and non-retrogression in the realisation of the rights to water and sanitation 2013, para. 44
- Paragraph text
- While certain safeguards are in place in several countries to protect consumers, for example from disconnections due to non-payment of bills in cases of inability to pay, there remain concerns relating to sustainability. Often profits made by private operators are almost fully distributed among shareholders, rather than being partially reinvested in maintaining and extending service provision, the result being increased prices for consumers, continued need for public investment, and potentially unsustainable services. For instance, when contracts fail to incorporate minimum levels of spending on operation and maintenance of systems, this affects their sustainability.
- Body
- Special Rapporteur on the human rights to safe drinking water and sanitation
- Document type
- Special Procedures' report
- Means of adoption
- N.A.
- Topic(s)
- Economic Rights
- Equality & Inclusion
- Governance & Rule of Law
- Person(s) affected
- N.A.
- Year
- 2013
Paragraph
Sustainability and non-retrogression in the realisation of the rights to water and sanitation 2013, para. 63
- Paragraph text
- Ensuring efficient tax systems that enable continued investments in the water and sanitation sectors contributes to sustainability and guards against impermissible retrogressions. Mobilizing tax revenue, in an appropriately targeted manner, is the responsibility of governments, and a way of implementing their human rights obligations. Methods such as assessing the effective tax rate (or tax to gross domestic product ratio) can be utilized to provide indicators for reviewing and benchmarking States, identifying failures in their efforts to mobilize resources to meet the need for a water and sanitation sector that is sustainable for all, forever.
- Body
- Special Rapporteur on the human rights to safe drinking water and sanitation
- Document type
- Special Procedures' report
- Means of adoption
- N.A.
- Topic(s)
- Economic Rights
- Governance & Rule of Law
- Water & Sanitation
- Person(s) affected
- All
- N.A.
- Year
- 2013
Paragraph
Participation in the realization of the human rights to water and sanitation 2014, para. 63
- Paragraph text
- Participation involves determining which and how strategies and programmes are funded, how the Government can raise revenue, how existing funding can be restructured and what alternative solutions should be sought. For example, in Milton Keynes, in the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, a referendum was held resulting in an agreement to higher council taxes for improved service provision. Service providers should also engage residents in designing the mode of payment. The residents of Kayole-Soweto, Kenya, negotiated a social connection policy with Nairobi Water, enabling them to spread out their payment of the connection fee over two years.
- Body
- Special Rapporteur on the human rights to safe drinking water and sanitation
- Document type
- Special Procedures' report
- Means of adoption
- N.A.
- Topic(s)
- Economic Rights
- Governance & Rule of Law
- Person(s) affected
- N.A.
- Year
- 2014
Paragraph
Different levels and types of services and the human rights to water and sanitation 2015, para. 38
- Paragraph text
- [The present report considers three main types of services:] Connection to a piped network
- Body
- Special Rapporteur on the human rights to safe drinking water and sanitation
- Document type
- Special Procedures' report
- Means of adoption
- N.A.
- Topic(s)
- Economic Rights
- Person(s) affected
- N.A.
- Year
- 2015
Paragraph
Affordability of water and sanitation services 2015, para. 32
- Paragraph text
- The affordability of water and sanitation services and disconnections are inextricably linked, as in many instances the failure to pay for services leads to disconnection.
- Body
- Special Rapporteur on the human rights to safe drinking water and sanitation
- Document type
- Special Procedures' report
- Means of adoption
- N.A.
- Topic(s)
- Economic Rights
- Equality & Inclusion
- Water & Sanitation
- Person(s) affected
- N.A.
- Year
- 2015
Paragraph
Affordability of water and sanitation services 2015, para. 81
- Paragraph text
- However, monitoring affordability is not a straightforward process. Accurate and meaningful monitoring of affordability is extremely complex. If carried out on the basis of an affordability standard, the necessary parameters for calculating affordability - the expenses for accessing water and sanitation in comparison to overall household expenditure, and the real income of a household - are difficult to measure. Monitoring whether a household's expenditure on water and sanitation exceeds a specific proportion of its income in a specific context is not easily done, given the precarious incomes of many low-income households, and the many different types of expenses for water and sanitation services in informal settlements, where affordability concerns are most acute. Given these difficulties, States often use an "average" or a "lowest" income level, and an assumed acceptable volume of water to set appropriate service charges. However, such generalizations hide whether individuals can actually afford services in their particular context, which may involve a large household, or individuals with specific health problems.
- Body
- Special Rapporteur on the human rights to safe drinking water and sanitation
- Document type
- Special Procedures' report
- Means of adoption
- N.A.
- Topic(s)
- Economic Rights
- Equality & Inclusion
- Health
- Water & Sanitation
- Person(s) affected
- N.A.
- Year
- 2015
Paragraph
Affordability of water and sanitation services 2015, para. 83
- Paragraph text
- The ECE Protocol on Water and Health has developed an Equitable Access Scorecard, which assists States to monitor whether services are affordable. This scorecard looks beyond the affordability of tariffs to other measures that Member States may employ to ensure affordability. This includes monitoring the inclusion of affordability concerns in water and sanitation policy, the affordability of self-provision, whether public funding is made available to address affordability concerns, how much public funding has actually been spent on affordability concerns, and whether social protection measures are effective in ensuring affordability.
- Body
- Special Rapporteur on the human rights to safe drinking water and sanitation
- Document type
- Special Procedures' report
- Means of adoption
- N.A.
- Topic(s)
- Economic Rights
- Equality & Inclusion
- Water & Sanitation
- Person(s) affected
- N.A.
- Year
- 2015
Paragraph
Development cooperation and the human rights to water and sanitation 2017, para. 66
- Paragraph text
- Improvements to partner States’ water and sanitation services funded through development cooperation, even when provided without an obligation for full repayment, often entail an increased need for revenues from tariffs or taxes to keep those services operational and sustainable in the long term. Some funders request or even impose an obligation on partner States to fully or partially recover the costs to operate and maintain such systems through tariffs. Consequently, depending on how tariffs for water and sanitation services are set upon completion, these projects can have an impact on affordable access to services. When funders impose conditionalities requiring full cost recovery through tariffs and the result is higher service fees for users, the affected users must be able to petition the amount of the tariff and seek recourse. If they are not able to do so, the public authorities are therefore not protecting users from the adverse impact of unaffordable services, and the funder shares responsibility for facilitating the creation of such circumstances.
- Body
- Special Rapporteur on the human rights to safe drinking water and sanitation
- Document type
- Special Procedures' report
- Means of adoption
- N.A.
- Topic(s)
- Economic Rights
- Water & Sanitation
- Person(s) affected
- N.A.
- Year
- 2017
Paragraph
Sustainability and non-retrogression in the realisation of the rights to water and sanitation 2013, para. 45
- Paragraph text
- Private service provision can also create concerns for other important human rights principles and standards, such as the principles of participation and accountability. During the current crisis, private sector participation in public services delivery, including in water provision, has been a condition for bailout packages signed with indebted countries. Once the decision to privatize has been made, and especially in the context of economic crisis, the process of selling the assets often does not include sufficient opportunities for meaningful public participation.
- Body
- Special Rapporteur on the human rights to safe drinking water and sanitation
- Document type
- Special Procedures' report
- Means of adoption
- N.A.
- Topic(s)
- Economic Rights
- Governance & Rule of Law
- Person(s) affected
- N.A.
- Year
- 2013
Paragraph