A/67/278 arms and presumption of innocence, among others. While the rules regarding due process are included in several provisions of international human rights treaties, of particular relevance is article 14 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, which provides that “all persons shall be equal before the courts and tribunals” in criminal and civil cases 5 and creates an obligation upon States to ensure that everyone has access to “a fair and public hearing by a competent, independent and impartial tribunal established by law” in “the determination of any criminal charge against him or of his rights and obligations in a suit at law”. 10. The principle of equality and non-discrimination obliges States to take measures to ensure that all individuals are entitled to equal access to judicial and adjudicatory mechanisms without distinction on the basis of race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth or other status, and that all parties in judicial or legal proceedings are treated without any discrimination. The principle of equality and non-discrimination extends to prevent discrimination on the basis of social and economic status, as implied in the phrase “other status”. 6 11. Thus, States have an obligation to construct a legal and institutional framework which facilitates access to independent and effective judicial and adjudicatory mechanisms and ensures a fair outcome for those seeking redress, without discrimination of any kind. However, guaranteeing de jure access to judicial and adjudicatory mechanisms is not sufficient to ensure that all individuals have de facto access to justice. States must also take positive measures to ensure laws and policies are substantively non-discriminatory, including measures to eliminate conditions which cause or help to perpetuate discrimination. 7 In many instances, laws, policies and procedures may indirectly discriminate against, or have a disproportionate impact upon, persons living in poverty. In addition, various extralegal factors also limit or obstruct their de facto access to justice. 12. To ensure that the poor have de facto enjoyment of the rights to an effective remedy, equality before the courts and a fair trial, States must take effective measures to remove any regulatory, social or economic obstacles that impede or hamper persons living in poverty from accessing remedies and securing a fair and equitable outcome in any judicial or adjudicatory process. This includes removing obstacles imposed by the unequal economic or social status of those seeking redress, taking into account the principles of equality before the courts and equality of arms, which are integral parts of due process. 8 13. These principles require that claimants or defendants must be able to exercise their rights and defend their interests effectively and in full procedural equality with other parties. When there is a big disparity in the economic or social status of litigants, as is often the case when those living in poverty seek redress for grievances against more powerful parties, there is a high risk of an unequal trial. For example, this is likely when impoverished workers want to bring a case against their __________________ 5 6 7 8 12-45806 Human Rights Committee, General Comment No. 32, para. 13. Human Rights Committee, General Comment No. 32, para. 9, and Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, General Comment No. 20, para. 35. Economic and social status is explicitly included as a ground of discrimination in the American Convention on Human Rights (art. 1). CCPR/C/GC/18, para. 9, and E/C.12/GC/20, para. 8. Human Rights Committee, General Comment No. 32. 5