Consejos de búsqueda
ordenados por
30 listados de 46 Entidades
Informe del Relator Especial sobre el derecho a la privacidad
- Organo
- Relator especial sobre el derecho a la privacidad
- Condicón jurídica
- Derecho dispositivo no negociado
- Tipo de documento
- Informe de procedimientos especiales
- Año
- 2018
- Código de documento
- A/HRC/37/62
- Fecha de adición
- 11 de dic. de 2023
Documento
Implementación de los principios de finalidad, eliminación y responsabilidad demostrada o proactiva en el tratamiento de datos personales recolectados por entidades públicas con ocasión de la pandemia de COVID-19
- Organo
- Relator especial sobre el derecho a la privacidad
- Condicón jurídica
- Derecho dispositivo no negociado
- Tipo de documento
- Informe de procedimientos especiales
- Año
- 2022
- Código de documento
- A/HRC/52/37
- Fecha de adición
- 11 de dic. de 2023
Documento
Principios que informan la privacidad y la protección de datos personales
- Organo
- Relator especial sobre el derecho a la privacidad
- Condicón jurídica
- Derecho dispositivo no negociado
- Tipo de documento
- Informe de procedimientos especiales
- Año
- 2022
- Código de documento
- A/77/196
- Fecha de adición
- 11 de dic. de 2023
Documento
La privacidad y la protección de datos personales en Iberoamérica: ¿un paso hacia la globalización?
- Organo
- Relator especial sobre el derecho a la privacidad
- Condicón jurídica
- Derecho dispositivo no negociado
- Tipo de documento
- Informe de procedimientos especiales
- Año
- 2022
- Código de documento
- A/HRC/49/55
- Fecha de adición
- 11 de dic. de 2023
Documento
Informe del Relator Especial sobre el derecho a la privacidad
- Organo
- Relator especial sobre el derecho a la privacidad
- Condicón jurídica
- Derecho dispositivo no negociado
- Tipo de documento
- Informe de procedimientos especiales
- Año
- 2021
- Código de documento
- A/76/220
- Fecha de adición
- 11 de dic. de 2023
Documento
La inteligencia artificial y la privacidad, así como la privacidad de los niños
- Organo
- Relator especial sobre el derecho a la privacidad
- Condicón jurídica
- Derecho dispositivo no negociado
- Tipo de documento
- Informe de procedimientos especiales
- Año
- 2021
- Código de documento
- A/HRC/46/37
- Fecha de adición
- 11 de dic. de 2023
Documento
Informe del Relator Especial sobre el derecho a la privacidad
- Organo
- Relator especial sobre el derecho a la privacidad
- Condicón jurídica
- Derecho dispositivo no negociado
- Tipo de documento
- Informe de procedimientos especiales
- Año
- 2020
- Código de documento
- A/75/147
- Fecha de adición
- 11 de dic. de 2023
Documento
Informe del Relator Especial sobre el derecho a la privacidad
- Organo
- Relator especial sobre el derecho a la privacidad
- Condicón jurídica
- Derecho dispositivo no negociado
- Tipo de documento
- Informe de procedimientos especiales
- Año
- 2020
- Código de documento
- A/HRC/43/52
- Fecha de adición
- 11 de dic. de 2023
Documento
Informe del Relator Especial sobre el derecho a la privacidad
- Organo
- Relator especial sobre el derecho a la privacidad
- Condicón jurídica
- Derecho dispositivo no negociado
- Tipo de documento
- Informe de procedimientos especiales
- Año
- 2019
- Código de documento
- A/74/277
- Fecha de adición
- 11 de dic. de 2023
Documento
Informe del Relator Especial sobre el derecho a la privacidad
- Organo
- Relator especial sobre el derecho a la privacidad
- Condicón jurídica
- Derecho dispositivo no negociado
- Tipo de documento
- Informe de procedimientos especiales
- Año
- 2019
- Código de documento
- A/HRC/40/63
- Fecha de adición
- 11 de dic. de 2023
Documento
Informe del Relator Especial sobre el derecho a la privacidad
- Organo
- Relator especial sobre el derecho a la privacidad
- Condicón jurídica
- Derecho dispositivo no negociado
- Tipo de documento
- Informe de procedimientos especiales
- Año
- 2018
- Código de documento
- A/73/438
- Fecha de adición
- 11 de dic. de 2023
Documento
Informe del Relator Especial sobre el derecho a la privacidad
- Organo
- Relator especial sobre el derecho a la privacidad
- Condicón jurídica
- Derecho dispositivo no negociado
- Tipo de documento
- Informe de procedimientos especiales
- Año
- 2017
- Código de documento
- A/HRC/34/60
- Fecha de adición
- 11 de dic. de 2023
Documento
Report of the Special Rapporteur on the right to privacy
- Organo
- Relator especial sobre el derecho a la privacidad
- Condicón jurídica
- Derecho dispositivo no negociado
- Tipo de documento
- Informe de procedimientos especiales
- Año
- 2019
- Código de documento
- A/HRC/40/63
- Fecha de adición
- 11 de dic. de 2023
Documento
Informe del Relator Especial del Consejo de Derechos Humanos sobre el derecho a la privacidad
- Organo
- Relator especial sobre el derecho a la privacidad
- Condicón jurídica
- Derecho dispositivo no negociado
- Tipo de documento
- Informe de procedimientos especiales
- Año
- 2017
- Código de documento
- A/72/540
- Fecha de adición
- 11 de dic. de 2023
Documento
Report of the Special Rapporteur on the right to privacy
- Organo
- Relator especial sobre el derecho a la privacidad
- Condicón jurídica
- Derecho dispositivo no negociado
- Tipo de documento
- Informe de procedimientos especiales
- Año
- 2019
- Código de documento
- A/HRC/40/63
- Fecha de adición
- 11 de dic. de 2023
Documento
First report: Important developments and substantive issues, March-July 2016
- Organo
- Relator especial sobre el derecho a la privacidad
- Condicón jurídica
- Derecho dispositivo no negociado
- Tipo de documento
- Informe de procedimientos especiales
- Año
- 2016
- Código de documento
- A/71/368
- Fecha de adición
- 19 de ago. de 2019
Documento
First report: Important developments and substantive issues, March-July 2016 2016, para. 34
- Paragraph text
- The democratic oversight of intelligence services in Germany remains a cause for concern. The Special Rapporteur shares the concerns of Nils Muižnieks, the Commissioner for Human Rights of the Council of Europe, and notes that his findings of October 2015 have not been contradicted. In particular, that: Current challenges relating to effective oversight of intelligence and security services in Germany include the lack of resources and expertise, the scope of the oversight of telecommunications, problems of coordination, as well as the absence of effective remedies for persons affected by surveillance of their telecommunications. The Commissioner is particularly concerned by the lack of resources and technical expertise of the oversight bodies and their secretariat. In this respect, the ratio of the number of overseers to the number of those subject to oversight is especially telling: two bodies of 13 members, supported by a small secretariat, are responsible for the oversight of activities involving, for the largest agency (the BND), a staff of about 6,000. It is the Special Rapporteur's intention to follow up such concerns in various forums, including IIOF2016 and, at the appropriate moment, directly with the Government of Germany.
- Organismo
- Special Rapporteur on the right to privacy
- Tipo de documento
- Special Procedures' report
- Temas
- Governance & Rule of Law
- Personas afectadas
- N.A.
- Año
- 2016
- Fecha de adición
- 19 de ago. de 2019
Párrafo
First report: Important developments and substantive issues, March-July 2016 2016, para. 44
- Paragraph text
- The present report is constrained by the imposed arbitrary word limit and has left out commentary on at least a dozen areas on which the mandate holder has worked. These areas will hopefully be developed further in future thematic and generic reports.
- Organismo
- Special Rapporteur on the right to privacy
- Tipo de documento
- Special Procedures' report
- Temas
- Governance & Rule of Law
- Humanitarian
- Personas afectadas
- N.A.
- Año
- 2016
- Fecha de adición
- 19 de ago. de 2019
Párrafo
First report: Important developments and substantive issues, March-July 2016 2016, para. 39
- Paragraph text
- While the Special Rapporteur can understand the anxiety induced by the recent spate of attacks in Germany, he continues to look to that country for leadership in the field of privacy and data protection and extends an offer, as in the case of the United Kingdom, to work with the Special Rapporteur to produce a new law and an adequate oversight resource regime which would serve as an example of best practice globally.
- Organismo
- Special Rapporteur on the right to privacy
- Tipo de documento
- Special Procedures' report
- Temas
- Governance & Rule of Law
- Personas afectadas
- N.A.
- Año
- 2016
- Fecha de adición
- 19 de ago. de 2019
Párrafo
First report: Important developments and substantive issues, March-July 2016 2016, para. 35
- Paragraph text
- On 28 June 2016, the Government of Germany signed off on a draft law on the Federal Intelligence Service (the Bundesnachrichtendienst, or BND) that amended several existing laws containing provisions on the surveillance of non-German citizens outside of Germany. On 8 July 2016, the draft law passed its first reading in Parliament. It is expected that two remaining readings of the draft law, including the final vote, could take place as early as the fourth quarter of 2016.
- Organismo
- Special Rapporteur on the right to privacy
- Tipo de documento
- Special Procedures' report
- Temas
- Governance & Rule of Law
- Personas afectadas
- N.A.
- Año
- 2016
- Fecha de adición
- 19 de ago. de 2019
Párrafo
First report: Important developments and substantive issues, March-July 2016 2016, para. 37b
- Paragraph text
- [Furthermore, the draft German law raises a whole plethora of other concerns:] Mass surveillance: mass and targeted surveillance of extraterritorial communications between non-German citizens would be effectively authorized in cases where the communication interception is carried out in Germany. While targeted surveillance in line with the criteria outlined in Zakharov v. Russia is of less concern, mass surveillance remains a cause for grave concern and prima facie runs counter to the standards established in European law;
- Organismo
- Special Rapporteur on the right to privacy
- Tipo de documento
- Special Procedures' report
- Temas
- Governance & Rule of Law
- Personas afectadas
- N.A.
- Año
- 2016
- Fecha de adición
- 19 de ago. de 2019
Párrafo
First report: Important developments and substantive issues, March-July 2016 2016, para. 21
- Paragraph text
- The Special Rapporteur will here outline some preliminary observations in an attempt to move the debate about smartphones beyond privacy, with the intent of eventually moving the debate back to core privacy concerns better informed by the confirmation or abnegation of societal values regarding "the bigger picture". It is the Special Rapporteur's position that other appropriate standards of behaviour need to be examined within society before a more definitive view can be taken about some of the privacy dimensions of smartphone use.
- Organismo
- Special Rapporteur on the right to privacy
- Tipo de documento
- Special Procedures' report
- Temas
- Equality & Inclusion
- Health
- Año
- 2016
- Fecha de adición
- 19 de ago. de 2019
Párrafo
First report: Important developments and substantive issues, March-July 2016 2016, para. 28
- Paragraph text
- Despite the rulings of numerous national constitutional and regional human rights courts, the Special Rapporteur observes that there is an increased tendency for governments to promote more invasive laws for surveillance, which allow for the thinly disguised permanent mass surveillance of citizens.
- Organismo
- Special Rapporteur on the right to privacy
- Tipo de documento
- Special Procedures' report
- Temas
- Governance & Rule of Law
- Personas afectadas
- All
- Año
- 2016
- Fecha de adición
- 19 de ago. de 2019
Párrafo
First report: Important developments and substantive issues, March-July 2016 2016, para. 45
- Paragraph text
- While broadly satisfied with the collaboration to date, the Special Rapporteur recommends that more governments engage with the mandate and, as other governments have done during the first year of activity, come forward to consult on draft privacy laws and related areas such as surveillance when these are still at an early stage. Furthermore, the Special Rapporteur strongly encourages and appreciates participation in, and facilitation of, initiatives organized by the mandate holder, such as IIOF2016 or informal country visits or various workshop conferences.
- Organismo
- Special Rapporteur on the right to privacy
- Tipo de documento
- Special Procedures' report
- Temas
- Governance & Rule of Law
- Personas afectadas
- N.A.
- Año
- 2016
- Fecha de adición
- 19 de ago. de 2019
Párrafo
First report: Important developments and substantive issues, March-July 2016 2016, para. 43
- Paragraph text
- Furthermore, the Special Rapporteur has created structures for further investigation and consultation by setting up five Working Parties, one each for the Thematic Action Streams identified in the first set of five priorities: Big Data and Open Data; Security and Surveillance; Health Data; Personal data processed by corporations; and "A better understanding of Privacy". These will provide the basis for thematic reports, which are expected to start being presented in 2017-2018. This methodology has permitted the Special Rapporteur to partly overcome resource constraints by tapping into a global pool of experts prepared to provide their domain expertise on an unpaid volunteer basis. The Special Rapporteur will, however, continue to seek extramural funding and welcomes all forms of assistance to carry out his mandate properly.
- Organismo
- Special Rapporteur on the right to privacy
- Tipo de documento
- Special Procedures' report
- Temas
- Governance & Rule of Law
- Health
- Personas afectadas
- N.A.
- Año
- 2016
- Fecha de adición
- 19 de ago. de 2019
Párrafo
First report: Important developments and substantive issues, March-July 2016 2016, para. 42
- Paragraph text
- The Special Rapporteur has launched a system of structured consultations around the world. Civil society, individuals, governments, corporations and other stakeholders have registered their interest in various privacy-related topics by writing to the Special Rapporteur and/or requesting meetings, most of which were granted. These meetings have enabled the Special Rapporteur to construct lists of stakeholders in various sectors and to use these lists to invite stakeholders to meetings around the world. Structured consultations are often held behind closed doors (at the behest of stakeholders) but can include a mix of invitees and people who write in to request to attend a publicized event.
- Organismo
- Special Rapporteur on the right to privacy
- Tipo de documento
- Special Procedures' report
- Temas
- Governance & Rule of Law
- Personas afectadas
- N.A.
- Año
- 2016
- Fecha de adición
- 19 de ago. de 2019
Párrafo
First report: Important developments and substantive issues, March-July 2016 2016, para. 41
- Paragraph text
- In the first full year of office, the Special Rapporteur has visited 14 countries during 20 trips undertaken for the mandate holder's business. These have included visits to countries as geographically far apart as Australia, Brazil, New Zealand and the United States, as well as 10 European States. Although technically speaking these were "informal" country visits, on many occasions they included the full array of engagements carried out during traditional official visits of the Special Rapporteur, including meetings with ministers, ministry officials, intelligence services, oversight agencies, data protection commissioners, law enforcement, civil society and leading corporations. In an overwhelming number of cases, the Special Rapporteur was received in a very positive manner. The next 12 months will also include at least two and possibly three official country visits, all tentatively scheduled, one each on three different continents (Africa, Asia and Latin America).
- Organismo
- Special Rapporteur on the right to privacy
- Tipo de documento
- Special Procedures' report
- Temas
- Governance & Rule of Law
- Personas afectadas
- N.A.
- Año
- 2016
- Fecha de adición
- 19 de ago. de 2019
Párrafo
First report: Important developments and substantive issues, March-July 2016 2016, para. 40
- Paragraph text
- The National Institute for Transparency, Access to Information and Protection of Personal Data (INAI) of Mexico issued a very interesting judgment (Expediente PPD.0050/16) on 13 July 2016, where we read that: "It is pertinent to note that although the right to the protection of personal data, in accordance with its constitutional regulation, is an autonomous right to the protection of private life, there should be a broader interpretation of both concepts, while the latter means a sphere where anyone can freely develop their personality." Therefore, in general, the protection of private life includes other rights and specific guarantees for the storage of information, access to personal data, as well as the regulation on protection of private communications, names, physical and moral integrity.
- Organismo
- Special Rapporteur on the right to privacy
- Tipo de documento
- Special Procedures' report
- Temas
- Civil & Political Rights
- Governance & Rule of Law
- Social & Cultural Rights
- Personas afectadas
- All
- Año
- 2016
- Fecha de adición
- 19 de ago. de 2019
Párrafo
First report: Important developments and substantive issues, March-July 2016 2016, para. 38
- Paragraph text
- In the light of the above, the new draft German law prima facie suggests that the German authorities have not learned anything from the October 2015 report by Mr. Muižnieks. Instead of providing the Special Rapporteur with a model law which can be used as an example of good practice around the world, the Government of Germany has come up with something which is worse than disappointing. With all its many defects, the United Kingdom draft Investigatory Powers Bill at least attempted to partly rectify the weak oversight regime previously criticized by the Special Rapporteur and others. While far from perfect, the new proposed oversight regime in the United Kingdom would appear to be an improvement over the previous situation. Not so in Germany which, unless it pulls back from the brink and radically changes course, promises to take over the position hitherto held by the United Kingdom as the country with the weakest oversight regime in the western world in proportion to the size of its intelligence services.
- Organismo
- Special Rapporteur on the right to privacy
- Tipo de documento
- Special Procedures' report
- Temas
- Governance & Rule of Law
- Personas afectadas
- N.A.
- Año
- 2016
- Fecha de adición
- 19 de ago. de 2019
Párrafo
First report: Important developments and substantive issues, March-July 2016 2016, para. 37d
- Paragraph text
- The level of resourcing of oversight of the proposed mass surveillance under the draft law is hopelessly inadequate and of the wrong type. The new law envisages a three-member committee that is only required to meet four times a year and which may not have sufficient staff or resources to oversee mass surveillance operations that are, by their very definition, extensive in scope. This leaves the Special Rapporteur in exactly the same zone of concern as that expressed by Mr. Muižnieks. Moreover, given that the appointment and composition of the membership comes from the executive does nothing to strengthen the impression of independent oversight.
- Organismo
- Special Rapporteur on the right to privacy
- Tipo de documento
- Special Procedures' report
- Temas
- Governance & Rule of Law
- Personas afectadas
- N.A.
- Año
- 2016
- Fecha de adición
- 19 de ago. de 2019
Párrafo