نصائح البحث
Effective and full implementation of the right to health framework, including justiciability of ESCR and the right to health; the progressive realisation of the right to health; the accountability deficit of transnational corporations; and the current ... 2014, para. 63
- Paragraph text
- Annulment applications by States on the ground of bias have in many instances been rejected. In one case, the State argued for the recusal of an arbitrator on the ground that the award would be used to further the arbitrator's argument as counsel in another case. The State lost. An issue of bias also arises where an arbitrator has an interest in the investor's business. In one such case, the State's application to annul the award was rejected because there was "no material effect on the final decision of the Tribunal, which was in any event unanimous".
- Body
- Special Rapporteur on the right of everyone to the enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health
- Document type
- Special Procedures' report
- Topic(s)
- Civil & Political Rights
- Governance & Rule of Law
- Person(s) affected
- N.A.
- Year
- 2014
- Date added
- Aug 19, 2019
Paragraph
1 shown of 1 entities