The rights to freedom of peaceful assembly and of association in the context of natural resource exploitation projects 2015, para. 24b
Paragraph- Paragraph text
- [A notable shortcoming of the voluntary obligations for corporations is that they do not go far enough in ensuring that both States and businesses are held accountable for any failures to comply with them, nor do they encourage robust oversight by Governments of actions by businesses that may violate human rights. Several documents set out voluntary human rights obligations for companies in relation to human rights in general and the rights to freedom of peaceful assembly and of association in particular. These include:] The Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights, endorsed by the Human Rights Council in 2011, which set out three pillars to the relationship between business and human rights. Firstly, States have the obligation to respect, protect and fulfil human rights and they should do this by taking measures that ensure businesses respect human rights, including by promoting and enforcing enabling laws and policies. Secondly, business enterprises have the obligation to respect internationally recognized human rights. Thirdly, States are required to ensure that victims of human rights violations have access to effective remedies including judicial and non-judicial remedies (Guiding Principles 25-28);
- Legal status
- Non-negotiated soft law
- Body
- Special Rapporteur on the rights to freedom of peaceful assembly and association
- Document type
- Special Procedures' report
- Means of adoption
- N.A.
- Topic(s)
- Economic Rights
- Equality & Inclusion
- Governance & Rule of Law
- Person(s) affected
- N.A.
- Year
- 2015
- Paragraph type
- Other
- Reference
- SR Freedom of Assembly, Report to the HRC (2015), A/HRC/29/25, para. 24b.
- Paragraph number
- 24b
sorted by
Date added
94 relationships, 94 entities