E/2011/27 E/CN.6/2011/12 agreements, and in this regard requests the secretariats of such agreements, as appropriate, to include a gender perspective in the preparation of guidelines for reporting. 80. At its 16th meeting, on 4 March, the representative of the Philippines orally revised the draft resolution and circulated the text in an informal paper. 81. At the same meeting, the Commission was informed that the draft resolution had no programme budget implications. 82. Subsequently, Australia, Austria, Belgium, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Canada, the Central African Republic, Croatia, the Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, France, Gabon, the Gambia, Germany, Greece, Guinea, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Japan, Latvia, Liechtenstein, Lithuania, Mali, Malta, Mexico, Monaco, Montenegro, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovenia, Sweden, Switzerland and the United Kingdom joined in sponsoring the draft resolution. 83. Also, at the 16th meeting, the Commission adopted the draft resolution E/CN.6/2011/L.1, as orally revised and circulated in the informal paper (see chap. I, sect. D, resolution 55/1). 84. After the adoption of the draft resolution, a statement was made by the representative of the Russian Federation and by the observer for Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of). Situation of and assistance to Palestinian women 85. At the 15th meeting, on 4 March, the representative of Argentina, on behalf of the States Members of the United Nations that are members of the Group of 77 and China, as well as Palestine, introduced a draft resolution entitled “Situation of and assistance to Palestinian women” (E/CN.6/2011/L.2). 86. At its 16th meeting, on 4 March, the Commission was informed that the draft resolution had no programme budget implications. 87. At the same meeting, a statement was made by the representative of Argentina, on behalf of the States Members of the United Nations that are members of the Group of 77 and China. 88. Also at the same meeting, following a statement made by the observer for Hungary (on behalf of the European Union), the Commission adopted draft resolution E/CN.6/2011/L.2 by a roll-call vote of 26 to 2, with 8 abstentions (see chap. I, sect. B). The voting was as follows: 32 In favour: Argentina, Armenia, Bangladesh, Belarus, China, Comoros, Cuba, Dominican Republic, El Salvador, Gabon, Gambia, India, Iraq, Malaysia, Mauritania, Mongolia, Namibia, Nicaragua, Pakistan, Paraguay, Philippines, Russian Federation, Senegal, Swaziland, Turkey, Uruguay. __________________ 32 38 The delegations of Rwanda and Azerbaijan indicated that, had they been present, they would have voted in favour of the draft resolution; the delegation of Spain indicated that it would have abstained from the vote; and the delegation of Niger indicated that their vote should have been in favour of the draft resolution. 11-28654