Post conflict and post disaster reconstruction and the right to adequate housing 2011, para. 42

Paragraph
Paragraph text
Studies have demonstrated the potential negative effects of failing to follow this approach. One example is research done in Gujarat, India, in the aftermath of the 2001 earthquake which left 1.2 million people homeless and damaged 1.7 million properties including 15,000 schools, affecting a total of 490 towns and 8,000 villages. This was met with a comprehensive, generally successful and internationally acclaimed relief and rehabilitation effort managed by the Gujarat State Disaster Management Authority. The response was coordinated through a system of "village adoption", whereby NGOs and other entities took on responsibility for the reconstruction of the villages. Most affected households were offered two options: owner-driven reconstruction and donor-driven reconstruction. In the process different approaches were followed, allowing for flexibility, with varying success. A number of the lessons drawn from the study emphasized the importance of the involvement and active agency of the affected people, as well as the influence of location on the lives of affected communities. In one case, a new township constructed three kilometres from the original village that had been destroyed was found six years after the earthquake to be empty but for one or two houses occupied by migrant workers renting the properties from the intended owners. The intended inhabitants of this settlement, who had initially accepted the offer of houses built for them, had returned to the original village and built their own: "[The villagers said] that they did not want to leave their village, '…it is the home of our ancestors'. When asked who built the village, the proud response is that they did it themselves". In another village, while people had occupied the houses that had been built for them, they described their new settlement in "wholly negative" terms such as: "It is dead"; "We are bored"; "There are no shops ".
Legal status
Non-negotiated soft law
Body
Special Rapporteur on adequate housing as a component of the right to an adequate standard of living
Document type
Special Procedures' report
Means of adoption
N.A.
Topic(s)
  • Humanitarian
Person(s) affected
  • Persons on the move
Year
2011
Paragraph type
Other
Reference
SR Housing, Report to the HRC (2011), A/HRC/16/42, para. 42.
Paragraph number
42