Development cooperation and the human rights to water and sanitation 2017, para. 65

Paragraph
Paragraph text
One project aiming to provide piped water to a small town excluded some of the poorest inhabitants who were living in more distant locations from that town. A common rationale that is cited to justify such exclusion is the standard of maximum per capita cost of investment in water and sanitation. Such standards can result in the exclusion of more dispersed populations or populations who live in areas where solutions entail greater costs. That project failed to adhere to the principle of equality and non-discrimination by intentionally excluding certain inhabitants from its scope. Conversely, the project specifically took into consideration persons with disabilities in the project’s intervention area and ensured their inclusion through a baseline study aimed at identifying such individuals. Moreover, local entrepreneurs were trained to design appropriate toilets according to the needs of persons with disabilities.
Legal status
Non-negotiated soft law
Body
Special Rapporteur on the human rights to safe drinking water and sanitation
Document type
Special Procedures' report
Means of adoption
N.A.
Topic(s)
  • Equality & Inclusion
  • Water & Sanitation
Person(s) affected
  • Persons with disabilities
Year
2017
Paragraph type
Other
Paragraph focus
Project selection, design and implementation
Paragraph number
65