E/2002/27 E/CN.6/2002/13 28. At the same meeting, the representative of Azerbaijan orally revised the draft resolution. The revisions were subsequently issued in document E/CN.6/2002/L.1/Rev.1, which was before the Commission at its 14th meeting, on 15 March. 29. At the 14th meeting, on 15 March, the representative of Azerbaijan introduced revisions to draft resolution E/CN.6/2002/L.1/Rev.1, which were circulated in an informal paper. 30. At the same meeting, Burkina Faso, Ghana,1 the Islamic Republic of Iran, Kyrgyzstan, Malaysia, Pakistan, the Philippines,1 Suriname 1 and the United States of America joined in sponsoring the revised draft resolution, as further revised. 31. The Commission was advised that the revised draft resolution contained no programme budget implications. 32. Also at the 14th meeting, the Commission adopted the revised draft resolution, as further revised (see chap. I, sect. C, resolution 46/1). The situation of and assistance to Palestinian women 33. At the 9th meeting, on 11 March, the observer for Venezuela, 1 on behalf of the States Members of the United Nations that are members of the Group of 77 and China, introduced a draft resolution entitled “The situation of and assistance to Palestinian women” (E/CN.6/2002/L.2). 34. At the 12th meeting, on 15 March, the Commission was advised that the draft resolution contained no programme budget implications. 35. At the same meeting, the Commission approved the draft resolution by a recorded vote of 38 to 1, and recommended it to the Economic and Social Council for adoption (see chap. I, sect. A, draft resolution I). The voting was as follows: 2 In favour: Argentina, Azerbaijan, Belgium, Botswana, Brazil, Burkina Faso, Chile, China, Croatia, Cuba, Democratic People’s Republic of Korea, Denmark, Egypt, Germany, Guatemala, Guinea, Indonesia, Iran (Islamic Republic of), Italy, Japan, Kyrgyzstan, Lithuania, Malawi, Malaysia, Mexico, Mongolia, Netherlands, Pakistan, Republic of Korea, Russian Federation, Senegal, South Africa, Sudan, Tunisia, Turkey, United Arab Emirates, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, United Republic of Tanzania. Against: United States of America. 36. Statements in explanation of vote after the vote were made by the representatives of the United States of America and the Islamic Republic of Iran. 37. The observer for Israel made a statement after the adoption of the draft resolution. 38. The observer for Palestine also made a statement. __________________ 2 32 The delegation of Burundi subsequently stated that, had it been present during the vote, it would have voted in favour of the draft resolution.

Select target paragraph3

Connect to a paragraph
Connect to an entity
Disable highlights
Add to table of contents