Due diligence and trafficking in persons 2015, para. 18
Paragraph- Paragraph text
- The requirement that due diligence be exercised in good faith - meaning the taking of "positive steps and measures by States" - also means that a lack of resources or capacity cannot completely shield States from their due diligence obligations. Indeed, often, it is not more resources but rather their reallocation - including towards preventative policies - that is needed for States to act diligently as assessed under the particular circumstances. For many States' anti-trafficking policies, the "form in which due diligence has thus far been pursued is not without alternatives;" due diligence requires pursuing these alternatives to maximize efforts to ensure the human rights of trafficked persons in all aspects of anti-trafficking responses. While in practice some of these efforts to ensure the human rights of trafficked persons may be implemented by non-State actors (e.g., through civil society-run assistance programmes), States cannot delegate their due diligence obligations.
- Legal status
- Non-negotiated soft law
- Body
- Special Rapporteur on trafficking in persons, especially in women and children
- Document type
- Special Procedures' report
- Means of adoption
- N.A.
- Topic(s)
- Governance & Rule of Law
- Violence
- Person(s) affected
- N.A.
- Year
- 2015
- Paragraph type
- Other
- Paragraph number
- 18
sorted by
Date added
44 relationships, 44 entities